to not to do mistake, BUT play for win, despite SF recommendation
https://lichess.org/McjLahkP/black#149
what does SF mean? Starfleet? Sorry I get into sci-fi computer games too much.
This game was an incredible 96 moves - the longest I have ever seen.
I think when you trade down to one bishop on both side, you are taking a big risk because it is a pawn race relying on luck.
Best to avoid trading down to one bishop which is the weakest piece to be left with cause you can't use it on half the squares. If you must trade to one piece, then choose a knight cause you are can be more creative. Avoid one rook or bishop. One rook on both sides usually ends up in endless spite checks by angry players trying to run out the time.
@Tlilchantli said [^](/forum/redirect/post/HKDxXDxl)
> what does SF mean? Starfleet? Sorry I get into sci-fi computer games too much.
> This game was an incredible 96 moves - the longest I have ever seen.
> I think when you trade down to one bishop on both side, you are taking a big risk because it is a pawn race relying on luck.
> Best to avoid trading down to one bishop which is the weakest piece to be left with cause you can't use it on half the squares. If you must trade to one piece, then choose a knight cause you are can be more creative. Avoid one rook or bishop. One rook on both sides usually ends up in endless spite checks by angry players trying to run out the time.
yeah true, SF is his Mastery Stockfish, coming from wandering to learn whole world to play chess
of course I would rather left knight, but it wasn't that easy I think, besides it doesn't help all the time. Yes I was playing on luck, didn't saw another way, or rather played on reflexes thinking it's safe to defend a pawn. I wonder, if there was some tricks to squeeze position from drawish state
@aVague said [^](/forum/redirect/post/UD2dAAy0)
> to not to do mistake, BUT play for win, despite SF recommendation
> https://lichess.org/McjLahkP/black#149
Today i find you play excellent chess, we are not machines.
We have to reduce our mistakes to minus 1 that's the real fun in chess.
@Brutal-baby said [^](/forum/redirect/post/dWjgq0BF)
> > to not to do mistake, BUT play for win, despite SF recommendation
> > https://lichess.org/McjLahkP/black#149
>
> Today i find you play excellent chess, we are not machines.
> We have to reduce our mistakes to minus 1 that's the real fun in chess.
Yes, Much Thx. to negate errors, I need to fight My reflexes first, some moves are made without deep thinking, just because it feels easier, BUT true Funf of chess is when You really feel the Position!
@aVague said [^](/forum/redirect/post/aLWzRanQ)
> > > to not to do mistake, BUT play for win, despite SF recommendation
> > > https://lichess.org/McjLahkP/black#149
> >
> > Today i find you play excellent chess, we are not machines.
> > We have to reduce our mistakes to minus 1 that's the real fun in chess.
>
> Yes, Much Thx. to negate errors, I need to fight My reflexes first, some moves are made without deep thinking, just because it feels easier, BUT true Funf of chess is when You really feel the Position!
Yessssssss
You said it all my buddy.
@Brutal-baby said [^](/forum/redirect/post/7IEGpyKL)
> > > > to not to do mistake, BUT play for win, despite SF recommendation
> > > > https://lichess.org/McjLahkP/black#149
> > >
> > > Today i find you play excellent chess, we are not machines.
> > > We have to reduce our mistakes to minus 1 that's the real fun in chess.
> >
> > Yes, Much Thx. to negate errors, I need to fight My reflexes first, some moves are made without deep thinking, just because it feels easier, BUT true Funf of chess is when You really feel the Position!
>
> Yessssssss
> You said it all my buddy.
I m waiting for Your Games, to Fire Up Analysis Section