@AsDaGo said [^](/forum/redirect/post/qz70NlJW)
> I'm glad this is actually zugzwang. When I read the title, I got PTSD flashbacks to [this post](https://lichess.org/forum/game-analysis/zugzwang-mate-2)!
The position is kinda goofy but yes, it's actually zugzwang
@fernandocatolico
Your AI is hallucinating.
Great game!
@deadlypolka said [^](/forum/redirect/post/jberbC5o)
> The position is kinda goofy but yes, it's actually zugzwang
Well no, actually it isn't a true one...since Black could win even if White was able to pass.
Very interesting, Batman
@MrPushwood said [^](/forum/redirect/post/gQDyCGDm)
> > The position is kinda goofy but yes, it's actually zugzwang
>
> Well no, actually it isn't a true one...since Black could win even if White was able to pass.
After Kg3 dark squared bishop and king literally has no activity so it's winning for black even if it weren't for M7, and after f4, 1 minutes of calculation and realized that opponent cant save g2 square if I just hold rook on the second rank was good start I think
Still funny forced mate sequence in terms of, it is M7 but all I should do is hold the rook on the second rank, don't blunder gxf4+ or allowing opponent rook check losing tempo, just shuffling king to pass turns.
@MrPushwood you're right but it is interesting,right?
@SANJAY-KURAMA2003 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/rm8vEKHP)
> hey wait
>
> * why 31. `re1` was not a **blunder**??
It's zugzwang. You can only move the rook, there is no other option.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.