Average rating opponent after analysis. • page 1/1 • General Chess Discussion • lichess.org

Do you guys often lose against players who played 300-500 points above the rating?

I look up my games on chessigma these days and find that in like 90 percent of lost games my oponents played like a1850 to 2050..
Even tho a 1300 rated player on lichess is suposed to be nowhere near a normal 1300 qua skill and strenght on chess.com.
I myself do perform on such levels from time to time, be it maybe 1 or 2 times in 40 games.

They say a 1300 lichess compared to a 1300 chess.com is much weaker but i feel like these days it is harder here than on chess.com..

Do you guys often lose against players who played 300-500 points above the rating? I look up my games on chessigma these days and find that in like 90 percent of lost games my oponents played like a1850 to 2050.. Even tho a 1300 rated player on lichess is suposed to be nowhere near a normal 1300 qua skill and strenght on chess.com. I myself do perform on such levels from time to time, be it maybe 1 or 2 times in 40 games. They say a 1300 lichess compared to a 1300 chess.com is much weaker but i feel like these days it is harder here than on chess.com..

ChessPriyome

"Even tho a 1300 rated player on lichess is suposed to be nowhere near a normal 1300 qua skill and strenght on chess.com."

Says who?

Accepting the rating comparisons from chess.com vs. liChess as gospel is basically folly.

Different systems, different player pools, etc.

I would not put much stock into it.

"Even tho a 1300 rated player on lichess is suposed to be nowhere near a normal 1300 qua skill and strenght on chess.com." Says who? Accepting the rating comparisons from chess.com vs. liChess as gospel is basically folly. Different systems, different player pools, etc. I would not put much stock into it.