"... Steinitz often had people over to his house ... On one of those visits by Loyd, ... Steinitz decided to play a little trick on his visitor. The following is not a literal account of what happened, but it is a true representation of the substance of it according to Steinitz.
'"Could you judge approximately the strength of two players if I showed you part of one of their games, and if in order to save time I gave you some critical comments which, of course, you may judge for yourself?" I asked,
"Yes, I think so," replied Loyd modestly.
"Well," I said, "Please look at the following position: ..."
[Diagram of position after 1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bb5 a6 4 Ba4 Nf6 5 d3 Bc5 6 c3 b5 7 Bc2 d5 8 exd5 Nxd5.]
Continuing my little lecture I said: "You notice that ..."
[Steinitz commenting to Loyd about various aspects of the play in the game. (Sorry, too much to type.)]
... "... Now, what do you think of the strength of the two players. Are they first, second or third class?" ...
... he answered at once: "Third class at the utmost."
"Would you be surprised to learn," I said, "that this play occurred not merely once, but actually in two games of the match between Morphy and Anderssen, ..." ...
... The two great masters ... had not the slightest suspicion that their development contained defects that about twenty-eight years later could only be described as grave strategical errors.'
... Steinitz was completely wrong on almost all counts! ...
... Steinitz could not have come up with a worse example of the superiority of the modern school over the old. ..." - The Ink War (2022) by IM Willy Hendriks
"... Steinitz often had people over to his house ... On one of those visits by Loyd, ... Steinitz decided to play a little trick on his visitor. The following is not a literal account of what happened, but it is a true representation of the substance of it according to Steinitz.
'"Could you judge approximately the strength of two players if I showed you part of one of their games, and if in order to save time I gave you some critical comments which, of course, you may judge for yourself?" I asked,
"Yes, I think so," replied Loyd modestly.
"Well," I said, "Please look at the following position: ..."
[Diagram of position after 1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bb5 a6 4 Ba4 Nf6 5 d3 Bc5 6 c3 b5 7 Bc2 d5 8 exd5 Nxd5.]
Continuing my little lecture I said: "You notice that ..."
[Steinitz commenting to Loyd about various aspects of the play in the game. (Sorry, too much to type.)]
... "... Now, what do you think of the strength of the two players. Are they first, second or third class?" ...
... he answered at once: "Third class at the utmost."
"Would you be surprised to learn," I said, "that this play occurred not merely once, but actually in two games of the match between Morphy and Anderssen, ..." ...
... The two great masters ... had not the slightest suspicion that their development contained defects that about twenty-eight years later could only be described as grave strategical errors.'
... Steinitz was completely wrong on almost all counts! ...
... Steinitz could not have come up with a worse example of the superiority of the modern school over the old. ..." - The Ink War (2022) by IM Willy Hendriks