i think he his.
i think he his.
i think he his.
yes
Fischer, Morphy both played at a eerily strong level without the existence of modern engines. Sindarov, young and talented, very capable but yet to prove himself.
Kasparov was more dominant over his peers and for a longer time.
Carlsen only drew his classical world championship matches against Karjakin and Caruana, and he could have lost both matches: Karjakin missed a draw in the one game he lost and Caruana missed a forced checkmate.
Carlsen is more like a first among equals.
i think he is the best of all time but at the same time he is the most average player who became world championof his era
No.
what
No.
Unless Magnus' reign lasts for the next 5 years, Garry Kasparov maintains that crown