<Comment deleted by user>
@chessmistakezzz said [^](/forum/redirect/post/Dt5afwRo)
> From my perspective, it is cowardly
Well, it's OK not to allow a take back since thats still their fault, but I do think it's a good thing to do. If I'm playing with anyone I know I let them take back, but I usually don't if they're winning anyways.
Even more cowardly is letting one's time run out after the takeback was declined.
https://lichess.org/rJykojHs
Absolutely not.
For the normal people reading this, you can deactivate takebacks and the possibilities of requests for them, with this option:
https://lichess.org/account/preferences/game-behavior#takebacksWithOpponentApproval
If you are playing chess over the board and your opponent touch a piece accidentally, or in a online tournament and your opponent make a mouse slip, it is understandable that we will do anything to win. If it is not a important game, what is the reason behind trying to win by all cost.
@Royals_Fan22 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/nFvqhfYr)
> Well, it's OK not to allow a take back since thats still their fault, but I do think it's a good thing to do. If I'm playing with anyone I know I let them take back, but I usually don't if they're winning anyways.
"If you are playing chess over the board and your opponent touch a piece accidentally, or in a online tournament and your opponent make a mouse slip, it is understandable we will do anything to win. If it is not a important game, what is the reason behind trying to win by all cost."
I sorry for not showing the context
Incompetence should be rewarded
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.