I don't want to play when the rating is 1700 and makes 0 mistakes.

@RemRus said ^

I don't understand why such opponents don't play at level 2200? Why do they have a low rating but a high percentage of game quality? It looks like cheaters, but I can’t make a report without justifying my opinion.

One accurate game doesn't mean someone plays at that level consistently ;p I've reported a considerable number of games like this too, and some still aren't banned. The accuracy compared to their rating looked pretty suspicious...

At your level people will not blunder out of nowhere. You can't just dance your pieces around randomly until they eventually blunder something. You have to make them blunder by creating pressure and putting them in tricky situations.

Just accept that you got outplayed slowly but surely, @RemRus. And stop public shaming, that is, explicitly OR IMPLICITLY accusing people of cheating.

Apart from the high accuracy there is ABSOLUTELY NO INDICATION that any of your aforementioned opponents were cheating. NONE.

Sometimes people may just stop using the account for a while, gain hundreds of rating points, and then play a game which happens to be with you. I've seen this happen and must admit that I am guilty of it myself on both my Chess.com and Lichess.org account.

@AveraWyvern said ^

One accurate game doesn't mean someone plays at that level consistently ;p I've reported a considerable number of games like this too, ...

If only reason you reported is high accuracy on one game its is just silly. That is not even close to being evidence.

@petri999 said ^

If only reason you reported is high accuracy on one game its is just silly. That is not even close to being evidence.

That's why I said "looked suspicious" not "definitely cheating" ;p