Is 2050 Rapid Rating On Chess.com Good For A 11-Year-Old Boy?

"With parental supervision, you can have your own account to play games"

And also turn on Kid Mode at https://lichess.org/account/kid.

good for anyone in general.

Rapid is not chess. It cannot be compared to real classical chess.

No, it's not good enough. You have only two years to become a GM like Gukesh or Karjakin.

@SNandy80 said ^

I have 2050 rapid rationg on chess.com, i play chess for 2 years

Achievements: 3x U10 District Champion, 3x U12 District Champion, Best 11 Years Old Portuguese Rapid Player, 27 Medals, 17 Trophies, ?? Participation Medals...

Dude you have a 2050 chess.com rating which is good, but in india and other states the average rating for a 1500 fide rated player who is good to play is around 2000. I dont think it is super rare. I am 13 and i have about 2250 peak in chess.com. I don't play much in lichess

@SNandy80 said ^

I have 2050 rapid rationg on chess.com, i play chess for 2 years

Achievements: 3x U10 District Champion, 3x U12 District Champion, Best 11 Years Old Portuguese Rapid Player, 27 Medals, 17 Trophies, ?? Participation Medals...

terible, terible rating. i turned 12 this month, but i was nm for a couple months already. u should be ashamed of ur rating.

PS:im being sarcastic

@SNandy80 said ^

I have 2050 rapid rationg on chess.com, i play chess for 2 years

Achievements: 3x U10 District Champion, 3x U12 District Champion, Best 11 Years Old Portuguese Rapid Player, 27 Medals, 17 Trophies, ?? Participation Medals...

stop yapping ur the same age as me.

@rbhoopathi04 said ^

I have 2050 rapid rationg on chess.com, i play chess for 2 years

Achievements: 3x U10 District Champion, 3x U12 District Champion, Best 11 Years Old Portuguese Rapid Player, 27 Medals, 17 Trophies, ?? Participation Medals...

stop yapping ur the same age as me.

be humble,not everyone at same age plays at same level, there is an IM at 11...as @tpr noted ,imagine he comes on a site called lichess and tells you to shut your mouth coz hes better ,not nice no...?,now i am much worse than you at chess,but everyone grows differntly as botivinik noted about karpov.... doesn't have a clue about chess, and there's no future at all for him in this profession and then he went on to become one of the greatest players ever to play the game, not everyone has same facilities and travel expnses as well so its better not to showoff your rating

This thread has no use other than OP flexing his achievements. OP seems to seek validation.

To #1: As I said in another thread, what's "good" is subjective. Magnus might call you trash, while a 1500 rated player might say that you're a really good player.

IMO a 2050 chess.com rapid player isn't very good.

@Chesslayer12 said ^

This thread has no use other than OP flexing his achievements. OP seems to seek validation.

To #1: As I said in another thread, what's "good" is subjective. Magnus might call you trash, while a 1500 rated player might say that you're a really good player.

IMO a 2050 chess.com rapid player isn't very good.

2050 is a good player i think both the OP and the NM are at fault both are flexing even though they know, for you what can i say youre a 2600 player 2040 is good