Your network blocks the Lichess assets!

lichess.org
Donate

the beauty of blullet chess

what is the beauty of bullet chess? i love it because it is like a dream both side lose so many pieces and still have a chance to win.

what is the beauty of bullet chess? i love it because it is like a dream both side lose so many pieces and still have a chance to win.

To me, it's the chess equivalent of an arcade game.

To me, it's the chess equivalent of an arcade game.

@lizani said in #2:

To me, it's the chess equivalent of an arcade game.
yes, i was playing in one bullet game. i said to myself" what are you doing?" i blundered everything and no one punished my mistakes. i like stockfish evaluation. because sometimes it says" white is winning, next move it moves black is winning.

@lizani said in #2: > To me, it's the chess equivalent of an arcade game. yes, i was playing in one bullet game. i said to myself" what are you doing?" i blundered everything and no one punished my mistakes. i like stockfish evaluation. because sometimes it says" white is winning, next move it moves black is winning.

sometimes, by looking into stockfish you can tell, which side moved their pieces

sometimes, by looking into stockfish you can tell, which side moved their pieces

the beauty of misspelling the title ...

the beauty of misspelling the title ...

the beauty is when you win a game like that against a high rated player

the beauty is when you win a game like that against a high rated player

Well even our GOAT Magnus agrees that fast chess is the real chess.

Well even our GOAT Magnus agrees that fast chess is the real chess.

To be fair Magnus is only talking about elite players, like super-GMs. The fact is that with all the engine prep and extremely precise play, a lot of games end up in draws. Faster time controls at that level allow for more errors and imbalanced positions that would normally be punished in classical.

For us regular players, classical/slow chess already has more than enough challenge, no need for faster time controls.

To be fair Magnus is only talking about elite players, like super-GMs. The fact is that with all the engine prep and extremely precise play, a lot of games end up in draws. Faster time controls at that level allow for more errors and imbalanced positions that would normally be punished in classical. For us regular players, classical/slow chess already has more than enough challenge, no need for faster time controls.

@crtex said in #8:

To be fair Magnus is only talking about elite players, like super-GMs. The fact is that with all the engine prep and extremely precise play, a lot of games end up in draws. Faster time controls at that level allow for more errors and imbalanced positions that would normally be punished in classical.

For us regular players, classical/slow chess already has more than enough challenge, no need for faster time controls.

define "regular"

@crtex said in #8: > To be fair Magnus is only talking about elite players, like super-GMs. The fact is that with all the engine prep and extremely precise play, a lot of games end up in draws. Faster time controls at that level allow for more errors and imbalanced positions that would normally be punished in classical. > > For us regular players, classical/slow chess already has more than enough challenge, no need for faster time controls. define "regular"

I don't have a hard rating in mind, but definitely myself and people rated quite a bit higher than me. Watching recaps of someone like Levy Rozman, you can see that classical chess is still very deep and interesting at that level.

I don't have a hard rating in mind, but definitely myself and people rated quite a bit higher than me. Watching recaps of someone like Levy Rozman, you can see that classical chess is still very deep and interesting at that level.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.