@DuMussDieUhrDruecken said in #70:
@kindaspongey ...
... citing whole and many posts from this thread in one post like #62, partly without even commenting or just commenting briefly and to one thought of a cited post.
readability is very horrible here in this thread, repetitions, misunderstandings, ignored obstructions and abundant unnecessary citing. ...
#62 was addressing four main subjects (your (for me) cryptic “fav” comment, ECO codes, the origin of tpr’s “criteria”, and tpr’s interest in the Reinfeld list). To make it less likely for there to be misunderstandings about my comments, it seemed to me to be desirable to identify some of the relevant context for each of those subjects.
@DuMussDieUhrDruecken said in #70:
> @kindaspongey ...
> ... citing whole and many posts from this thread in one post like #62, partly without even commenting or just commenting briefly and to one thought of a cited post.
> readability is very horrible here in this thread, repetitions, misunderstandings, ignored obstructions and abundant unnecessary citing. ...
#62 was addressing four main subjects (your (for me) cryptic “fav” comment, ECO codes, the origin of tpr’s “criteria”, and tpr’s interest in the Reinfeld list). To make it less likely for there to be misunderstandings about my comments, it seemed to me to be desirable to identify some of the relevant context for each of those subjects.