<Comment deleted by user>
Simple word: No, unless you actually used engines.
Simple word: No, unless you actually used engines.
I doubt if one game can ever be sufficient evidence. And playing one game with round 95% is definitely not even close.
I doubt if one game can ever be sufficient evidence. And playing one game with round 95% is definitely not even close.
Move 24. c4 for example is a pretty brilliant idea. Your a2 pawn was attacked so you combined defense of it with an attacking idea. It's very hard for most players to come up with that stuff.. so you should at the very least be extremely proud of this move. Good game.
Move 24. c4 for example is a pretty brilliant idea. Your a2 pawn was attacked so you combined defense of it with an attacking idea. It's very hard for most players to come up with that stuff.. so you should at the very least be extremely proud of this move. Good game.
heres what i found:
in Lichess, they dont look at one game, they look at hundreds of games you played, if its always perfect like %98 (unless you prove youre a GM or punishing bad moves easily) then yes they definitely flag you but seems that it was only 1 game you did, thats normal, i got %90 accuracy in chess.com too but very rarely, also if youre flagged, you dont get banned immediately, mods step in to check if Anti-cheating system is right, of course - they'll ban you but you can counter argue if youre top world class or your opponent is new, your accuracy and mistakes in other games are proof youre not cheatin but apply to Fairplay rules
heres what i found:
in Lichess, they dont look at one game, they look at hundreds of games you played, if its always perfect like %98 (unless you prove youre a GM or punishing bad moves easily) then yes they definitely flag you but seems that it was only 1 game you did, thats normal, i got %90 accuracy in chess.com too but very rarely, also if youre flagged, you dont get banned immediately, mods step in to check if Anti-cheating system is right, of course - they'll ban you but you can counter argue if youre top world class or your opponent is new, your accuracy and mistakes in other games are proof youre not cheatin but apply to Fairplay rules
@JustAChessPlayer177 said ^
heres what i found:
in Lichess, they dont look at one game, they look at hundreds of games you played, if its always perfect like %98 (unless you prove youre a GM or punishing bad moves easily) then yes they definitely flag you but seems that it was only 1 game you did, thats normal, i got %90 accuracy in chess.com too but very rarely, also if youre flagged, you dont get banned immediately, mods s...
its wrong
@JustAChessPlayer177 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/kUymqRcM)
> heres what i found:
> in Lichess, they dont look at one game, they look at hundreds of games you played, if its always perfect like %98 (unless you prove youre a GM or punishing bad moves easily) then yes they definitely flag you but seems that it was only 1 game you did, thats normal, i got %90 accuracy in chess.com too but very rarely, also if youre flagged, you dont get banned immediately, mods s...
its wrong
What will get you in trouble is not this game, but rather posting the same thing in multiple forms...
What will get you in trouble is not this game, but rather posting the same thing in multiple forms...
How Lichess Cheat Detection Works:
Engine correlation: The system checks how often a player’s moves match the top choices of engines like Stockfish.
Statistical analysis over time: No single game determines guilt. Lichess looks at long‐term patterns across hundreds of games.
Accuracy spikes: Sudden jumps to near‐perfect accuracy (like 98–99%) over many games are suspicious.
Timing patterns: Consistent pauses before strong moves can indicate engine use.
Error distribution: Humans make natural mistakes; a lack of errors across complex positions is a red flag.
Moderator review: Final bans are not automated — trained moderators check flagged accounts before action is taken. Theme Circles + 1
Alright, heres the answer how it works, seems that you'll be fine, yes i researched and CTRL+ C and CTRL + V'd it
How Lichess Cheat Detection Works:
Engine correlation: The system checks how often a player’s moves match the top choices of engines like Stockfish.
Statistical analysis over time: No single game determines guilt. Lichess looks at long‐term patterns across hundreds of games.
Accuracy spikes: Sudden jumps to near‐perfect accuracy (like 98–99%) over many games are suspicious.
Timing patterns: Consistent pauses before strong moves can indicate engine use.
Error distribution: Humans make natural mistakes; a lack of errors across complex positions is a red flag.
Moderator review: Final bans are not automated — trained moderators check flagged accounts before action is taken. Theme Circles + 1
Alright, heres the answer how it works, seems that you'll be fine, yes i researched and CTRL+ C and CTRL + V'd it
Please don't just blindly spit AI slop, it has a bunch of misinformation
Please don't just blindly spit AI slop, it has a bunch of misinformation
A single game with 6-9 seconds for every single move can be perfectly sufficient evidence, and new accounts blatantly cheating from the start can be banned within just a few dozen games.
And "banning", "flagging", "red mark" are all the same thing - some marks are made by algorithms, most are made by humans, some accounts may be under lasting suspicion but "flag" is not an appropriate term for that
And even GMs have been banned for constant engine-strength play
A single game with 6-9 seconds for every single move can be perfectly sufficient evidence, and new accounts blatantly cheating from the start can be banned within just a few dozen games.
And "banning", "flagging", "red mark" are all the same thing - some marks are made by algorithms, most are made by humans, some accounts may be under lasting suspicion but "flag" is not an appropriate term for that
And even GMs have been banned for constant engine-strength play
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.



