It's not fair when I recruited a whole team, but only 6 players count. The others scored so many points, but they just get thrown away. It's demotivating for the players who played hard.
The Top 6 rule was supposed to protect small teams, but it doesn't. Teams like Russia and AntichessMasters win anyway because they have both quantity AND quality. The rule doesn't stop them. It only punishes middle-sized teams like mine.
Look at the numbers from our last battle:
Top 6 counted: 633 points.
Total of our whole team: 1245 points.
612 points were wasted.
We recruited 25 players for that battle. If the rule fails its own purpose, why keep it?
Tournament ID for reference: yQkkr4Xn
Does anyone agree that all points should count?
It's not fair when I recruited a whole team, but only 6 players count. The others scored so many points, but they just get thrown away. It's demotivating for the players who played hard.
The Top 6 rule was supposed to protect small teams, but it doesn't. Teams like Russia and AntichessMasters win anyway because they have both quantity AND quality. The rule doesn't stop them. It only punishes middle-sized teams like mine.
Look at the numbers from our last battle:
Top 6 counted: 633 points.
Total of our whole team: 1245 points.
612 points were wasted.
We recruited 25 players for that battle. If the rule fails its own purpose, why keep it?
Tournament ID for reference: yQkkr4Xn
Does anyone agree that all points should count?




