lichess.org
Donate

Started a 10+0 game at a rating of 2527.... look at the rating difference

Himawari_Nohara

https://lichess.org/wBr00gKca2F9
image.png

  • Not a 2400, Not a 2300, Not even a 2200..... 2178.
  • 2178 is a great rating. I'm not shaming it, and I am nobody to shame it.
  • But a lobby random game where the rating difference is 349, I would pass it as a glitch.
  • It is just impossible that a site that has so many 2200s-2400s , not a single one clicked 10+0 when I clicked.
https://lichess.org/wBr00gKca2F9 ![image.png](https://image.lichess1.org/display?op=noop&path=xATSE17O9miG.png&sig=36ee7cce5b05bc73db6086f1ec07a4be100c0ef2) - Not a 2400, Not a 2300, Not even a 2200..... 2178. - 2178 is a great rating. I'm not shaming it, and I am nobody to shame it. - But a lobby random game where the rating difference is 349, I would pass it as a glitch. - It is just impossible that a site that has so many 2200s-2400s , not a single one clicked 10+0 when I clicked.
oiiaiaoiiia

your range had 2178 as an option in it, it's also likely your opponent had -0 +500 which would make it so he's more likely to be paired against someone higher rated

your range had 2178 as an option in it, it's also likely your opponent had -0 +500 which would make it so he's more likely to be paired against someone higher rated
oiiaiaoiiia

also lichess doesnt have to pick the closest person to your elo, and if it did do that it would cause you to be paired with the same group of people extremely often

also lichess doesnt have to pick the closest person to your elo, and if it did do that it would cause you to be paired with the same group of people extremely often