lichess.org
Donate

Tournaments leaderboard

I have noticed a few times banned people being on the tournament front page for months at a time, until the next yearly winner replaces them. Won't name them bc public shaming etc but I really think this should be prioritised.

It is a great disrespect and disservice to the true winners like Lance and the person who actually won the yearly (atomic?) not sure of the variant, to not have their name displayed in its rightful place for the full year.

tbh I think it is a real shame that the winners were removed from the Lichess homepage and put only on the tournament page, this imo would seem to reduce the importance of the Yearlies and would surely discourage some players from taking part at all.

I have noticed a few times banned people being on the tournament front page for months at a time, until the next yearly winner replaces them. Won't name them bc public shaming etc but I really think this should be prioritised. It is a great disrespect and disservice to the true winners like Lance and the person who actually won the yearly (atomic?) not sure of the variant, to not have their name displayed in its rightful place for the full year. tbh I think it is a real shame that the winners were removed from the Lichess homepage and put only on the tournament page, this imo would seem to reduce the importance of the Yearlies and would surely discourage some players from taking part at all.

Hmm, four months ago, when I wrote about this, it didn't cause anyone any concern.
It's a shame that Lichess can't always get to the root of the problem; bias gets in the way.

Hmm, four months ago, when I wrote about this, it didn't cause anyone any concern. It's a shame that Lichess can't always get to the root of the problem; bias gets in the way.

@Italiya said ^

Hmm, four months ago, when I wrote about this, it didn't cause anyone any concern.
It's a shame that Lichess can't always get to the root of the problem; bias gets in the way.

What bias?

@Italiya said [^](/forum/redirect/post/tCOc4qC7) > Hmm, four months ago, when I wrote about this, it didn't cause anyone any concern. > It's a shame that Lichess can't always get to the root of the problem; bias gets in the way. What bias?