Proof:
2+2=5
Minus 2, we get 2=3.
Minus 1, we get 1=2.
Thus, two people equals one person.
According to this conclusion, because Qin Shi Huang and I are two different people, I and Qin Shi Huang are the same person.
Therefore, I am Qin Shi Huang himself.
But obviously, 2 plus 2 does not equal 5. So my proof makes no sense.
Proof:
2+2=5
Minus 2, we get 2=3.
Minus 1, we get 1=2.
Thus, two people equals one person.
According to this conclusion, because Qin Shi Huang and I are two different people, I and Qin Shi Huang are the same person.
Therefore, I am Qin Shi Huang himself.
**But obviously, 2 plus 2 does not equal 5.** So my proof makes no sense.
Genuine doubt, what did you even expect someone to reply to ur post ;-;
Genuine doubt, what did you even expect someone to reply to ur post ;-;
@HuaTianXiangQi said ^
Proof:
2+2=5
Minus 2, we get 2=3.
Minus 1, we get 1=2.
Thus, two people equals one person.
According to this conclusion, because Qin Shi Huang and I are two different people, I and Qin Shi Huang are the same person.
Therefore, I am Qin Shi Huang himself.
But obviously, 2 plus 2 does not equal 5. So my proof makes no sense.
Source: Trust me, Qin.
@HuaTianXiangQi said [^](/forum/redirect/post/dFLegweF)
> Proof:
> 2+2=5
> Minus 2, we get 2=3.
> Minus 1, we get 1=2.
> Thus, two people equals one person.
> According to this conclusion, because Qin Shi Huang and I are two different people, I and Qin Shi Huang are the same person.
> Therefore, I am Qin Shi Huang himself.
>
> **But obviously, 2 plus 2 does not equal 5.** So my proof makes no sense.
Source: Trust me, Qin.
@HuaTianXiangQi said ^
But obviously, 2 plus 2 does not equal 5
You sure?
0 = 0
20 - 20 = 25 - 25
4x5 - 4x5 = 5x5 - 5x5
4 (5-5) = 5 (5-5)
Therefore, 4 = 5
2+2 = 5 :)
@HuaTianXiangQi said [^](/forum/redirect/post/dFLegweF)
>But obviously, 2 plus 2 does not equal 5
You sure?
0 = 0
20 - 20 = 25 - 25
4x5 - 4x5 = 5x5 - 5x5
4 (5-5) = 5 (5-5)
Therefore, 4 = 5
2+2 = 5 :)
@AveraWyvern said ^
But obviously, 2 plus 2 does not equal 5
You sure?
0 = 0
20 - 20 = 25 - 25
4x5 - 4x5 = 5x5 - 5x5
4 (5-5) = 5 (5-5)
Therefore, 4 = 5
2+2 = 5 :)
Don't forget to calculate things in parentheses first. You can only prove that 0 = 0.
@AveraWyvern said [^](/forum/redirect/post/cPPTQlsY)
> >But obviously, 2 plus 2 does not equal 5
>
> You sure?
>
> 0 = 0
>
> 20 - 20 = 25 - 25
>
> 4x5 - 4x5 = 5x5 - 5x5
>
> 4 (5-5) = 5 (5-5)
>
> Therefore, 4 = 5
>
> 2+2 = 5 :)
Don't forget to calculate things in parentheses first. You can only prove that 0 = 0.
@KhrivenilSSP said ^
Don't forget to calculate things in parentheses first. You can only prove that 0 = 0.
It’s 5 because I said so, hope this helps!
@KhrivenilSSP said [^](/forum/redirect/post/X3TI5d55)
> Don't forget to calculate things in parentheses first. You can only prove that 0 = 0.
It’s 5 because I said so, hope this helps!
@AveraWyvern said ^
Don't forget to calculate things in parentheses first. You can only prove that 0 = 0.
It’s 5 because I said so, hope this helps!
It's 4 because if 2+2=5 then we're using base-nine system since 4 is a non-existent number.
@AveraWyvern said [^](/forum/redirect/post/Nq5lJkex)
> > Don't forget to calculate things in parentheses first. You can only prove that 0 = 0.
>
> It’s 5 because I said so, hope this helps!
It's 4 because if 2+2=5 then we're using base-nine system since 4 is a non-existent number.
@KhrivenilSSP said ^
It’s 5 because I said so, hope this helps!
It's 4 because if 2+2=5 then we're using base-nine system since 4 is a non-existent number.
4 literally exists in base-9. Please go outside and touch some grass lmao
@KhrivenilSSP said [^](/forum/redirect/post/g4TLOpuu)
> > It’s 5 because I said so, hope this helps!
>
> It's 4 because if 2+2=5 then we're using base-nine system since 4 is a non-existent number.
4 literally exists in base-9. Please go outside and touch some grass lmao
@AveraWyvern said ^
It’s 5 because I said so, hope this helps!
It's 4 because if 2+2=5 then we're using base-nine system since 4 is a non-existent number.
4 literally exists in base-9. Please go outside and touch some grass lmao
But you're using a novembary system consisting of 012356789.
@AveraWyvern said [^](/forum/redirect/post/16lQyhD4)
> > > It’s 5 because I said so, hope this helps!
> >
> > It's 4 because if 2+2=5 then we're using base-nine system since 4 is a non-existent number.
>
> 4 literally exists in base-9. Please go outside and touch some grass lmao
But you're using a novembary system consisting of 012356789.
@KhrivenilSSP said ^
4 literally exists in base-9. Please go outside and touch some grass lmao
But you're using a novembary system consisting of 012356789.
Making up fake words because you're losing is wild fr
@KhrivenilSSP said [^](/forum/redirect/post/OIaIsV7K)
> > 4 literally exists in base-9. Please go outside and touch some grass lmao
>
> But you're using a novembary system consisting of 012356789.
Making up fake words because you're losing is wild fr