lichess.org
Donate

If 2+2 = 5, then I'm Qin Shi Huang.

@AveraWyvern said ^

4 literally exists in base-9. Please go outside and touch some grass lmao

But you're using a novembary system consisting of 012356789.

Making up fake words because you're losing is wild fr

Stop trying to sophisticate it. I know your counting system doesn't have the concept of four/quattor.

@AveraWyvern said [^](/forum/redirect/post/l8Ow3VIP) > > > 4 literally exists in base-9. Please go outside and touch some grass lmao > > > > But you're using a novembary system consisting of 012356789. > > Making up fake words because you're losing is wild fr Stop trying to sophisticate it. I know your counting system doesn't have the concept of four/quattor.

x=2+2
x=Qin Shui Huang
x is also one dollar
what is y?
Solve it in novembary numbers

this is nice,its been a while since ive done mathmatics

x=2+2 x=Qin Shui Huang x is also one dollar what is y? Solve it in novembary numbers this is nice,its been a while since ive done mathmatics

@KhrivenilSSP said ^

Making up fake words because you're losing is wild fr

Stop trying to sophisticate it. I know your counting system doesn't have the concept of four/quattor.

I ain't reading all that quattor lore it's literally just 5 lmao

@KhrivenilSSP said [^](/forum/redirect/post/cB0nPiu8) > > Making up fake words because you're losing is wild fr > > Stop trying to sophisticate it. I know your counting system doesn't have the concept of four/quattor. I ain't reading all that quattor lore it's literally just 5 lmao

@AveraWyvern said ^

Making up fake words because you're losing is wild fr

Stop trying to sophisticate it. I know your counting system doesn't have the concept of four/quattor.

I ain't reading all that quattor lore it's literally just 5 lmao

Then look at this picture.
Screenshot_20261019_200008_com.deepseek.chat.jpg

@AveraWyvern said [^](/forum/redirect/post/Hsbgv8sQ) > > > Making up fake words because you're losing is wild fr > > > > Stop trying to sophisticate it. I know your counting system doesn't have the concept of four/quattor. > > I ain't reading all that quattor lore it's literally just 5 lmao Then look at this picture. ![Screenshot_20261019_200008_com.deepseek.chat.jpg](https://image.lichess1.org/display?fmt=webp&h=0&op=resize&path=MdIMf6_F5O0w.jpg&w=864&sig=c84852fd6788a788bdfb76f4d38a4f88319f00fe)

@HuaTianXiangQi said ^

Proof:
2+2=5
Minus 2, we get 2=3.
Minus 1, we get 1=2.
Thus, two people equals one person.
According to this conclusion, because Qin Shi Huang and I are two different people, I and Qin Shi Huang are the same person.
Therefore, I am Qin Shi Huang himself.

But obviously, 2 plus 2 does not equal 5. So my proof makes no sense.

But you are only in shi huang
And not Qin shi huangdi
This is because you are not a king
And adding a di means you are a king
This is because kings do not exist in china anymore.
So you are qin shi huang

@HuaTianXiangQi said [^](/forum/redirect/post/dFLegweF) > Proof: > 2+2=5 > Minus 2, we get 2=3. > Minus 1, we get 1=2. > Thus, two people equals one person. > According to this conclusion, because Qin Shi Huang and I are two different people, I and Qin Shi Huang are the same person. > Therefore, I am Qin Shi Huang himself. > > **But obviously, 2 plus 2 does not equal 5.** So my proof makes no sense. But you are only in shi huang And not Qin shi huangdi This is because you are not a king And adding a di means you are a king This is because kings do not exist in china anymore. So you are qin shi huang

@KhrivenilSSP said ^

Then look at this picture.

Even the AI had to think about it for a second before it lied to you lmao

@KhrivenilSSP said [^](/forum/redirect/post/egHKOC5B) > Then look at this picture. Even the AI had to think about it for a second before it lied to you lmao

image.png

WTF?

![image.png](https://image.lichess1.org/display?fmt=png&h=0&op=resize&path=zyki8sCxO3El.png&w=864&sig=33b80182cf2d9d750b5399331ad4f0333729127d) WTF?

@AveraWyvern said ^

Then look at this picture.

Even the AI had to think about it for a second before it lied to you lmao

Yeah, you're sophisticating again. (calmly, but it was obvious I was trying not to laugh)

@AveraWyvern said [^](/forum/redirect/post/UGk3UN9W) > > Then look at this picture. > > Even the AI had to think about it for a second before it lied to you lmao Yeah, you're sophisticating again. (calmly, but it was obvious I was trying not to laugh)

@Voldstar said ^

image.png (https://image.lichess1.org/display?fmt=png&h=0&op=resize&path=zyki8sCxO3El.png&w=864&sig=33b80182cf2d9d750b5399331ad4f0333729127d)

WTF?

Screenshot_20261001_173143.jpg
Screenshot_20260830_124317.jpg

@Voldstar said [^](/forum/redirect/post/PbiySf2L) > image.png (https://image.lichess1.org/display?fmt=png&h=0&op=resize&path=zyki8sCxO3El.png&w=864&sig=33b80182cf2d9d750b5399331ad4f0333729127d) > > WTF? ![Screenshot_20261001_173143.jpg](https://image.lichess1.org/display?op=noop&path=x1cd4VnWo67o.jpg&sig=07287ec4b8490756437c40449ae7989030456072) ![Screenshot_20260830_124317.jpg](https://image.lichess1.org/display?op=noop&path=qiSz5GPE0-Bc.jpg&sig=7243fb04757c2692cae0af4772db4b20a0511d87)

Given two disjoint sets {a, b} and {c, d}. Take their union—how many elements are in the resulting set? If there are 5, what is the fifth element?

Given two disjoint sets {a, b} and {c, d}. Take their union—how many elements are in the resulting set? If there are 5, what is the fifth element?