@AveraWyvern said ^
4 literally exists in base-9. Please go outside and touch some grass lmao
But you're using a novembary system consisting of 012356789.
Making up fake words because you're losing is wild fr
Stop trying to sophisticate it. I know your counting system doesn't have the concept of four/quattor.
@AveraWyvern said [^](/forum/redirect/post/l8Ow3VIP)
> > > 4 literally exists in base-9. Please go outside and touch some grass lmao
> >
> > But you're using a novembary system consisting of 012356789.
>
> Making up fake words because you're losing is wild fr
Stop trying to sophisticate it. I know your counting system doesn't have the concept of four/quattor.
x=2+2
x=Qin Shui Huang
x is also one dollar
what is y?
Solve it in novembary numbers
this is nice,its been a while since ive done mathmatics
x=2+2
x=Qin Shui Huang
x is also one dollar
what is y?
Solve it in novembary numbers
this is nice,its been a while since ive done mathmatics
@KhrivenilSSP said ^
Making up fake words because you're losing is wild fr
Stop trying to sophisticate it. I know your counting system doesn't have the concept of four/quattor.
I ain't reading all that quattor lore it's literally just 5 lmao
@KhrivenilSSP said [^](/forum/redirect/post/cB0nPiu8)
> > Making up fake words because you're losing is wild fr
>
> Stop trying to sophisticate it. I know your counting system doesn't have the concept of four/quattor.
I ain't reading all that quattor lore it's literally just 5 lmao
@AveraWyvern said ^
Making up fake words because you're losing is wild fr
Stop trying to sophisticate it. I know your counting system doesn't have the concept of four/quattor.
I ain't reading all that quattor lore it's literally just 5 lmao
Then look at this picture.

@AveraWyvern said [^](/forum/redirect/post/Hsbgv8sQ)
> > > Making up fake words because you're losing is wild fr
> >
> > Stop trying to sophisticate it. I know your counting system doesn't have the concept of four/quattor.
>
> I ain't reading all that quattor lore it's literally just 5 lmao
Then look at this picture.

@HuaTianXiangQi said ^
Proof:
2+2=5
Minus 2, we get 2=3.
Minus 1, we get 1=2.
Thus, two people equals one person.
According to this conclusion, because Qin Shi Huang and I are two different people, I and Qin Shi Huang are the same person.
Therefore, I am Qin Shi Huang himself.
But obviously, 2 plus 2 does not equal 5. So my proof makes no sense.
But you are only in shi huang
And not Qin shi huangdi
This is because you are not a king
And adding a di means you are a king
This is because kings do not exist in china anymore.
So you are qin shi huang
@HuaTianXiangQi said [^](/forum/redirect/post/dFLegweF)
> Proof:
> 2+2=5
> Minus 2, we get 2=3.
> Minus 1, we get 1=2.
> Thus, two people equals one person.
> According to this conclusion, because Qin Shi Huang and I are two different people, I and Qin Shi Huang are the same person.
> Therefore, I am Qin Shi Huang himself.
>
> **But obviously, 2 plus 2 does not equal 5.** So my proof makes no sense.
But you are only in shi huang
And not Qin shi huangdi
This is because you are not a king
And adding a di means you are a king
This is because kings do not exist in china anymore.
So you are qin shi huang
@KhrivenilSSP said ^
Then look at this picture.
Even the AI had to think about it for a second before it lied to you lmao
@KhrivenilSSP said [^](/forum/redirect/post/egHKOC5B)
> Then look at this picture.
Even the AI had to think about it for a second before it lied to you lmao

WTF?

WTF?
@AveraWyvern said ^
Then look at this picture.
Even the AI had to think about it for a second before it lied to you lmao
Yeah, you're sophisticating again. (calmly, but it was obvious I was trying not to laugh)
@AveraWyvern said [^](/forum/redirect/post/UGk3UN9W)
> > Then look at this picture.
>
> Even the AI had to think about it for a second before it lied to you lmao
Yeah, you're sophisticating again. (calmly, but it was obvious I was trying not to laugh)
@Voldstar said [^](/forum/redirect/post/PbiySf2L)
> image.png (https://image.lichess1.org/display?fmt=png&h=0&op=resize&path=zyki8sCxO3El.png&w=864&sig=33b80182cf2d9d750b5399331ad4f0333729127d)
>
> WTF?


Given two disjoint sets {a, b} and {c, d}. Take their union—how many elements are in the resulting set? If there are 5, what is the fifth element?
Given two disjoint sets {a, b} and {c, d}. Take their union—how many elements are in the resulting set? If there are 5, what is the fifth element?