@Cedur216 said ^
There have been hate comments against @kind_Panda in forums lately.
Not mine at least. In fact many other comments criticizing her own flooding of short posts as well as the cult and spam resulting from it, were not hateful. I'm not sure if there was anything bad besides the notorious multiaccount guy:
https://lichess.org/forum/off-topic-discussion/why-is-the-purple-so-mean#OIVhhsHA
and I might as well cite the excellent words of clousems:
As to the question: I've been warning kids that this would happen for a couple of weeks now. I feel a bit like Cassandra (although Captain Grumpypants has me beat on the prophetic front, if we're being completely honest). If you try to shanghai the subforum into a playground for 12 year olds, the adults will be pissed.
I'd argue that children trying to force out real conversation is "mean". I'd also argue that nothing the purple people eater has said was particularly out of line, considering that we're all supposed to be adults here. If you want to participate in a forum designed for adults, you can't apply kid standards.
in conclusion, this place has become deeply divided between kids and adults. I don't think kids who emphasize their "friendship" so much actually know what proper friendship is, or how primitive their emotions are. which means I will still beg to differ on
@kind_Panda was actually friendly and nice to everyone.
because being omnipresent with casual short posts does not imply that.
P.S.
Yea, she was really nice....i dont understand why she got too much hate....
yet again, I object whether she was really hated so much, and you don't see the bigger picture.
But the biggest doubt is why shes cheat?
@Cedur216 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/nXsfoDu5)
> > There have been hate comments against @kind_Panda in forums lately.
> Not mine at least. In fact many other comments criticizing her own flooding of short posts as well as the cult and spam resulting from it, were not hateful. I'm not sure if there was anything bad besides the notorious multiaccount guy:
>
> https://lichess.org/forum/off-topic-discussion/why-is-the-purple-so-mean#OIVhhsHA
>
> and I might as well cite the excellent words of clousems:
>
> > As to the question: I've been warning kids that this would happen for a couple of weeks now. I feel a bit like Cassandra (although Captain Grumpypants has me beat on the prophetic front, if we're being completely honest). If you try to shanghai the subforum into a playground for 12 year olds, the adults will be pissed.
> > I'd argue that children trying to force out real conversation is "mean". I'd also argue that nothing the purple people eater has said was particularly out of line, considering that we're all supposed to be adults here. If you want to participate in a forum designed for adults, you can't apply kid standards.
>
> in conclusion, this place has become deeply divided between kids and adults. I don't think kids who emphasize their "friendship" so much actually know what proper friendship is, or how primitive their emotions are. which means I will still beg to differ on
>
> > @kind_Panda was actually friendly and nice to everyone.
>
> because being omnipresent with casual short posts does not imply that.
>
> P.S.
> > Yea, she was really nice....i dont understand why she got too much hate....
>
> yet again, I object whether she was really hated so much, and you don't see the bigger picture.
But the biggest doubt is why shes cheat?
@Cedur216 said ^
There have been hate comments against @kind_Panda in forums lately.
Not mine at least. In fact many other comments criticizing her own flooding of short posts as well as the cult and spam resulting from it, were not hateful. I'm not sure if there was anything bad besides the notorious multiaccount guy:
https://lichess.org/forum/off-topic-discussion/why-is-the-purple-so-mean#OIVhhsHA
and I might as well cite the excellent words of clousems:
As to the question: I've been warning kids that this would happen for a couple of weeks now. I feel a bit like Cassandra (although Captain Grumpypants has me beat on the prophetic front, if we're being completely honest). If you try to shanghai the subforum into a playground for 12 year olds, the adults will be pissed.
I'd argue that children trying to force out real conversation is "mean". I'd also argue that nothing the purple people eater has said was particularly out of line, considering that we're all supposed to be adults here. If you want to participate in a forum designed for adults, you can't apply kid standards.
in conclusion, this place has become deeply divided between kids and adults. I don't think kids who emphasize their "friendship" so much actually know what proper friendship is, or how primitive their emotions are. which means I will still beg to differ on
@kind_Panda was actually friendly and nice to everyone.
because being omnipresent with casual short posts does not imply that.
P.S.
Yea, she was really nice....i dont understand why she got too much hate....
yet again, I object whether she was really hated so much, and you don't see the bigger picture.
Why do you hate Kind_Panda so much? She was never mean or disrespectful to anyone. This is blasphemous and insulting and I think you should be better than that!
@Cedur216 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/nXsfoDu5)
> > There have been hate comments against @kind_Panda in forums lately.
> Not mine at least. In fact many other comments criticizing her own flooding of short posts as well as the cult and spam resulting from it, were not hateful. I'm not sure if there was anything bad besides the notorious multiaccount guy:
>
> https://lichess.org/forum/off-topic-discussion/why-is-the-purple-so-mean#OIVhhsHA
>
> and I might as well cite the excellent words of clousems:
>
> > As to the question: I've been warning kids that this would happen for a couple of weeks now. I feel a bit like Cassandra (although Captain Grumpypants has me beat on the prophetic front, if we're being completely honest). If you try to shanghai the subforum into a playground for 12 year olds, the adults will be pissed.
> > I'd argue that children trying to force out real conversation is "mean". I'd also argue that nothing the purple people eater has said was particularly out of line, considering that we're all supposed to be adults here. If you want to participate in a forum designed for adults, you can't apply kid standards.
>
> in conclusion, this place has become deeply divided between kids and adults. I don't think kids who emphasize their "friendship" so much actually know what proper friendship is, or how primitive their emotions are. which means I will still beg to differ on
>
> > @kind_Panda was actually friendly and nice to everyone.
>
> because being omnipresent with casual short posts does not imply that.
>
> P.S.
> > Yea, she was really nice....i dont understand why she got too much hate....
>
> yet again, I object whether she was really hated so much, and you don't see the bigger picture.
Why do you hate Kind_Panda so much? She was never mean or disrespectful to anyone. This is blasphemous and insulting and I think you should be better than that!
@Idk0011 I'm as good and objective as I've been in my post above. I could choose to not react to your accusations of being hateful, but I really wanna know where it comes from (or whether your standards are better than "kind_Panda is goat, all critics are hate")
@SANJAY-KURAMA2003 I do not know if she cheated or was banned for cheating. The last look at her profile suggested a different reason, assuming my knowledge is still up-to-date. Others hinted at games that looked suspicious or staged. We are not the judges at the end of the day anyway. Besides iirc she talked about having occasional borderline emotional states (when she closed her acc about 1 month ago) and emotional trouble can provoke cheating sometimes.
@Idk0011 I'm as good and objective as I've been in my post above. I could choose to not react to your accusations of being hateful, but I really wanna know where it comes from (or whether your standards are better than "kind_Panda is goat, all critics are hate")
@SANJAY-KURAMA2003 I do not know if she cheated or was banned for cheating. The last look at her profile suggested a different reason, assuming my knowledge is still up-to-date. Others hinted at games that looked suspicious or staged. We are not the judges at the end of the day anyway. Besides iirc she talked about having occasional borderline emotional states (when she closed her acc about 1 month ago) and emotional trouble can provoke cheating sometimes.
@EternalNRG said ^
Of course, the paid defenders have come in the defense of their role modal when there is not even an attack!
First of all, WTF do you mean paid defenders. And also, you agreed with hate comments towards @kind_Panda, then come and insult everyone who tries to stop this abhorrent behavior! I may report you right now for that offense!
@EternalNRG said [^](/forum/redirect/post/vDlxUlUL)
> Of course, the paid defenders have come in the defense of their role modal when there is not even an attack!
First of all, WTF do you mean paid defenders. And also, you agreed with hate comments towards @kind_Panda, then come and insult everyone who tries to stop this abhorrent behavior! I may report you right now for that offense!
i don’t really think she did anything wrong and mean. She was a great panda.
i don’t really think she did anything wrong and mean. She was a great panda.
@Idk0011 said ^
Of course, the paid defenders have come in the defense of their role modal when there is not even an attack!
First of all, WTF do you mean paid defenders. And also, you agreed with hate comments towards @kind_Panda, then come and insult everyone who tries to stop this abhorrent behavior! I may report you right now for that offense!
Ok your tone reveals that you're not up for any constructive discussion. Acknowledged.
@ucardidem2013 said ^
i don’t really think she did anything wrong and mean. She was a great panda.
nor did we when we pointed that she was posting too much, or when we were annoyed by all the spam threads
@Idk0011 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/0hRcoVdX)
> > Of course, the paid defenders have come in the defense of their role modal when there is not even an attack!
>
> First of all, WTF do you mean paid defenders. And also, you agreed with hate comments towards @kind_Panda, then come and insult everyone who tries to stop this abhorrent behavior! I may report you right now for that offense!
Ok your tone reveals that you're not up for any constructive discussion. Acknowledged.
@ucardidem2013 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/7C7WExfT)
> i don’t really think she did anything wrong and mean. She was a great panda.
nor did we when we pointed that she was posting too much, or when we were annoyed by all the spam threads
@Idk0011 said ^
Of course, the paid defenders have come in the defense of their role modal when there is not even an attack!
First of all, WTF do you mean paid defenders. And also, you agreed with hate comments towards @kind_Panda, then come and insult everyone who tries to stop this abhorrent behavior! I may report you right now for that offense!
Please report me. Challenge accepted. I stand by my point. The way you guys have been defending even when we are not hating that user (we are spitting facts) it almost looks like you are obliged to protect them. And using swears like 'WTF' don't change the fact that you are feeling insecure to the unfortunate truth.
Facts are facts.
Facts are not criticism.
Feedback is not criticism.
It is the way how you see it.
@Idk0011 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/0hRcoVdX)
> > Of course, the paid defenders have come in the defense of their role modal when there is not even an attack!
>
> First of all, WTF do you mean paid defenders. And also, you agreed with hate comments towards @kind_Panda, then come and insult everyone who tries to stop this abhorrent behavior! I may report you right now for that offense!
Please report me. Challenge accepted. I stand by my point. The way you guys have been defending even when we are not hating that user (we are spitting facts) it almost looks like you are obliged to protect them. And using swears like 'WTF' don't change the fact that you are feeling insecure to the unfortunate truth.
Facts are facts.
Facts are not criticism.
Feedback is not criticism.
It is the way how you see it.
@Cedur216 said ^
I'm as good and objective as I've been in my post above. I could choose to not react to your accusations of being hateful, but I really wanna know where it comes from (or whether your standards are better than "kind_Panda is goat, all critics are hate")
The thing that started this was an unfounded accusation of cheating, then comments that could be perceived as hateful towards my friend in forums. I unfortunately cannot find it in the hot mess of all the off topic forums, but I am honest and assure you that it happened.
@Cedur216 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/JD9iePls)
> I'm as good and objective as I've been in my post above. I could choose to not react to your accusations of being hateful, but I really wanna know where it comes from (or whether your standards are better than "kind_Panda is goat, all critics are hate")
The thing that started this was an unfounded accusation of cheating, then comments that could be perceived as hateful towards my friend in forums. I unfortunately cannot find it in the hot mess of all the off topic forums, but I am honest and assure you that it happened.
@EternalNRG said ^
Of course, the paid defenders have come in the defense of their role modal when there is not even an attack!
First of all, WTF do you mean paid defenders. And also, you agreed with hate comments towards @kind_Panda, then come and insult everyone who tries to stop this abhorrent behavior! I may report you right now for that offense!
Please report me. Challenge accepted. I stand by my point. The way you guys have been defending even when we are not hating that user (we are spitting facts) it almost looks like you are obliged to protect them. And using swears like 'WTF' don't change the fact that you are feeling insecure to the unfortunate truth.
Facts are facts.
Facts are not criticism.
Feedback is not criticism.
It is the way how you see it.
WTF, whenever I use it, stands for what the flip. I wouldn’t ever swear on a public forum.
@EternalNRG said [^](/forum/redirect/post/uTEZKE6j)
> > > Of course, the paid defenders have come in the defense of their role modal when there is not even an attack!
> >
> > First of all, WTF do you mean paid defenders. And also, you agreed with hate comments towards @kind_Panda, then come and insult everyone who tries to stop this abhorrent behavior! I may report you right now for that offense!
>
> Please report me. Challenge accepted. I stand by my point. The way you guys have been defending even when we are not hating that user (we are spitting facts) it almost looks like you are obliged to protect them. And using swears like 'WTF' don't change the fact that you are feeling insecure to the unfortunate truth.
>
> Facts are facts.
> Facts are not criticism.
> Feedback is not criticism.
> It is the way how you see it.
WTF, whenever I use it, stands for what the flip. I wouldn’t ever swear on a public forum.
Guys OFC everyone has their own opinions and ideas. Idk why you guys arguing. Like I mean ok, you may not like her or you may like her, that’s just your opinion.
There’s no point in swearing at each other.
Guys OFC everyone has their own opinions and ideas. Idk why you guys arguing. Like I mean ok, you may not like her or you may like her, that’s just your opinion.
There’s no point in swearing at each other.