lichess.org
Donate

Is iq rigged

@Coeus0224 said ^

It only tests you on how well you can take a test. But lots of people excel at other things, so defining them with an iq might not be entirely accurate.

so artemis fowls iq is wrong

No way, you read that too?

@Coeus0224 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/qPIyWxAK) > > It only tests you on how well you can take a test. But lots of people excel at other things, so defining them with an iq might not be entirely accurate. > > so artemis fowls iq is wrong No way, you read that too?

@GatoChess89 said ^

What is their IQ? Have they taken the test? For me, it's been verified by psychologists; btw, I know something about psychology.

My test is 127

That's logically false
first of all, your grammar is notroxious from all the different forums we saw you post in.
second, You're extremely immature, long time ago you used ai to create your team bio and team logo and forum pictures of a mango killing tung tung.
third, your bio exposes as a half human half ai due to the emojis and the intended bad spellings to throw us off.

if you do have 127 iq please answer my question

"A bat and a ball cost $1.10 in total. The bat costs $1.00 more than the ball. How much does the ball cost?"
you should know this if you did take a iq test before.
Dont use ai(your best friend)

edit: I saw your chess playstyle, it shows one move attacks without any logical reasoning behind it. 127 iq is a high percentile(correct me if wrong i think like 96th percentile) and people with that iq will always have a reason to back up their moves, even in chess.

@GatoChess89 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/Kdu1Q6xc) > > What is their IQ? Have they taken the test? For me, it's been verified by psychologists; btw, I know something about psychology. > > My test is 127 That's logically false first of all, your grammar is notroxious from all the different forums we saw you post in. second, You're extremely immature, long time ago you used ai to create your team bio and team logo and forum pictures of a mango killing tung tung. third, your bio exposes as a half human half ai due to the emojis and the intended bad spellings to throw us off. if you do have 127 iq please answer my question "A bat and a ball cost $1.10 in total. The bat costs $1.00 more than the ball. How much does the ball cost?" you should know this if you did take a iq test before. Dont use ai(your best friend) edit: I saw your chess playstyle, it shows one move attacks without any logical reasoning behind it. 127 iq is a high percentile(correct me if wrong i think like 96th percentile) and people with that iq will always have a reason to back up their moves, even in chess.

@TheAggroTurtle said ^

What is their IQ? Have they taken the test? For me, it's been verified by psychologists; btw, I know something about psychology.

My test is 127

That's logically false
first of all, your grammar is notroxious from all the different forums we saw you post in.
second, You're extremely immature, long time ago you used ai to create your te...

00.5$

@TheAggroTurtle said [^](/forum/redirect/post/6KnZKTeK) > > > What is their IQ? Have they taken the test? For me, it's been verified by psychologists; btw, I know something about psychology. > > > > My test is 127 > > That's logically false > first of all, your grammar is notroxious from all the different forums we saw you post in. > second, You're extremely immature, long time ago you used ai to create your te... 00.5$

@GatoChess89 said ^

What is their IQ? Have they taken the test? For me, it's been verified by psychologists; btw, I know something about psychology.

My test is 127

That's logically false
first of all, your grammar is notroxious from all the different forums we saw you post in.
second, You're extremely immature, long time ago you used ai ...

that shows yet again of ai use

regular humans use 5 cents, doesnt matter how smart they are. No one uses 0.05$ except for ai algorithms or humans pretending to be smart

explain how you got 5 cents then

@GatoChess89 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/z7iS4PP6) > > > > What is their IQ? Have they taken the test? For me, it's been verified by psychologists; btw, I know something about psychology. > > > > > > My test is 127 > > > > That's logically false > > first of all, your grammar is notroxious from all the different forums we saw you post in. > > second, You're extremely immature, long time ago you used ai ... that shows yet again of ai use regular humans use 5 cents, doesnt matter how smart they are. No one uses 0.05$ except for ai algorithms or humans pretending to be smart explain how you got 5 cents then

@TheAggroTurtle said ^

What is their IQ? Have they taken the test? For me, it's been verified by psychologists; btw, I know something about psychology.

My test is 127

That's logically false
first of all, your grammar is notroxious from all the different forums we saw you post in.
second, You're extremely immature, long time ago y...

ball costs 5 and the bat costs 1.05, which totals 10 And I don't use AI and I didn't do that image

@TheAggroTurtle said [^](/forum/redirect/post/zFZR0ypD) > > > > > What is their IQ? Have they taken the test? For me, it's been verified by psychologists; btw, I know something about psychology. > > > > > > > > My test is 127 > > > > > > That's logically false > > > first of all, your grammar is notroxious from all the different forums we saw you post in. > > > second, You're extremely immature, long time ago y... ball costs 5 and the bat costs 1.05, which totals 10 And I don't use AI and I didn't do that image

I do believe drive and ambition are more important for success rather than just iq.
Another factor is social intelligence.

I do believe drive and ambition are more important for success rather than just iq. Another factor is social intelligence.

@GatoChess89 said ^

What is their IQ? Have they taken the test? For me, it's been verified by psychologists; btw, I know something about psychology.

My test is 127

That's logically false
first of all, your grammar is notroxious from all the different forums we saw you post in.
second, You're extremely immature...

5+1.05 is not equal to 11

it has to be 0.05+10.5

how do you mess up two numbers without ai for a moment man?

@GatoChess89 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/fuQ8iRvW) > > > > > > What is their IQ? Have they taken the test? For me, it's been verified by psychologists; btw, I know something about psychology. > > > > > > > > > > My test is 127 > > > > > > > > That's logically false > > > > first of all, your grammar is notroxious from all the different forums we saw you post in. > > > > second, You're extremely immature... 5+1.05 is not equal to 11 it has to be 0.05+10.5 how do you mess up two numbers without ai for a moment man?

@whatismymainbro said ^

It only tests you on how well you can take a test. But lots of people excel at other things, so defining them with an iq might not be entirely accurate.

so artemis fowls iq is wrong

No way, you read that too?

yep

@whatismymainbro said [^](/forum/redirect/post/UOa9rpRJ) > > > It only tests you on how well you can take a test. But lots of people excel at other things, so defining them with an iq might not be entirely accurate. > > > > so artemis fowls iq is wrong > > No way, you read that too? yep

@TheAggroTurtle said ^

What is their IQ? Have they taken the test? For me, it's been verified by psychologists; btw, I know something about psychology.

My test is 127

That's logically false
first of all, your grammar is notroxious from all the different forums we saw you post in.
second, You're extreme...

I'm not going to respond anymore because you're q it very aggressively And I just reported you

@TheAggroTurtle said [^](/forum/redirect/post/ui7AVk4X) > > > > > > > What is their IQ? Have they taken the test? For me, it's been verified by psychologists; btw, I know something about psychology. > > > > > > > > > > > > My test is 127 > > > > > > > > > > That's logically false > > > > > first of all, your grammar is notroxious from all the different forums we saw you post in. > > > > > second, You're extreme... I'm not going to respond anymore because you're q it very aggressively And I just reported you

@GatoChess89 said ^

What is their IQ? Have they taken the test? For me, it's been verified by psychologists; btw, I know something about psychology.

My test is 127

That's logically false
first of all, your grammar is notroxious from all the different forums we saw you post in.
secon...

"q it" "And" with no period(so no uppercase). Great grammar you got there bud

wowwy im reported

Just own up to the truth. You're not even attempting to defend yourself.

and when i asked you the question, you closed lichess just to answer me a minute later, showing that you didn't really have to go. So if lichess is closed for a minute, it most likely means that you hopped on a different tab.

@GatoChess89 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/WWdNDbRs) > > > > > > > > What is their IQ? Have they taken the test? For me, it's been verified by psychologists; btw, I know something about psychology. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My test is 127 > > > > > > > > > > > > That's logically false > > > > > > first of all, your grammar is notroxious from all the different forums we saw you post in. > > > > > > secon... "q it" "And" with no period(so no uppercase). Great grammar you got there bud wowwy im reported Just own up to the truth. You're not even attempting to defend yourself. and when i asked you the question, you closed lichess just to answer me a minute later, showing that you didn't really have to go. So if lichess is closed for a minute, it most likely means that you hopped on a different tab.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.