Palestine, Israel whatever tragedy

what_game_is_this edited

I see a lot such threads.
I haven't read a lot if it,
as I'm sure it's mostly bullshit.

I hope nobody preaches whataboutism.
Nor tries to relativise losses.

As if one kill is good compared to 100.
Ugh!

I think it all is much too bad.

All this is because you follow bad leaders.
No matter your side.

World history, and current events
makes perfect sense when
you realize our leaders
have been and are insane.

Psychopaths and narcissists the lot.
No leader that start killings can be sane.

Is that difficult to understand?

Have no historian or
psychologist ever understood this?

Are they all simping for powerful people?

I'd like to hear from historians and
psychologists here, do you understand
that our leaders always was/are insane?

If not, how do you excuse their behaviour?

I see a lot such threads. I haven't read a lot if it, as I'm sure it's mostly bullshit. I hope nobody preaches whataboutism. Nor tries to relativise losses. As if one kill is good compared to 100. Ugh! I think it all is much too bad. All this is because you follow bad leaders. No matter your side. World history, and current events makes perfect sense when you realize our leaders have been and are insane. Psychopaths and narcissists the lot. No leader that start killings can be sane. Is that difficult to understand? Have no historian or psychologist ever understood this? Are they all simping for powerful people? I'd like to hear from historians and psychologists here, do you understand that our leaders always was/are insane? If not, how do you excuse their behaviour?

NIARTIST

You have no enemies, nor do i no one has enemies noone deserves to be hurt.

IamNOTamod

@NIARTIST said ^

You have no enemies, nor do i no one has enemies

I wish more people would start thinking like this.

@NIARTIST said [^](/forum/redirect/post/rdLzmBMJ) > You have no enemies, nor do i no one has enemies I wish more people would start thinking like this.

IamNOTamod edited

@what_game_is_this

You suggest that "all of our leaders are insane". And then, "No leader that start killings can be sane". So basically, you're implying that all the leaders of all the countries are starting killings, or am I reading this wrongly?

Additionally, what are YOUR thoughts on the following: if you believe that "no leader that start killings can be sane", what about leaders who respond to violence with violence? Are they, in your opinion, justified? If so, what difference, in your opinion, does it make?

@what_game_is_this You suggest that "all of our leaders are insane". And then, "No leader that start killings can be sane". So basically, you're implying that all the leaders of all the countries are starting killings, or am I reading this wrongly? Additionally, what are YOUR thoughts on the following: if you believe that "no leader that start killings can be sane", what about leaders who respond to violence with violence? Are they, in your opinion, justified? If so, what difference, in your opinion, does it make?

what_game_is_this

^
It is possible to be insane without any killing.

Not defending,
OBSERVE: defending,
yourself is an idiocy,
as it would be accepting
aggression and slavery.

Defending,
OBSERVE: defending,
is perfectly fine.

^ It is possible to be insane without any killing. Not defending, OBSERVE: defending, yourself is an idiocy, as it would be accepting aggression and slavery. Defending, OBSERVE: defending, is perfectly fine.