lichess.org
Donate

Proof 0=1

@B11portezaallanklark said in #31:

#30 They, Mods just don't chatban people immeadetly, they squint lemon and alittle bazil leaves and voila! They cut onions in they're eyes and travel to Singapore and meet Alizera! (JK)
really ?

@B11portezaallanklark said in #31: > #30 They, Mods just don't chatban people immeadetly, they squint lemon and alittle bazil leaves and voila! They cut onions in they're eyes and travel to Singapore and meet Alizera! (JK) really ?

@Linspiring said in #38:

@AYUBALLENA said in #29:
First of all, infinite is not a number
Second: Period numbers, like π
π is an irrational number, since their decimals are infinite, and as you know, adding infinite things leads to infinite, but π starts off with 3 which is not infinite, also that you would be adding lesser numbers each time.
Third: infinite + 1 > infinite, as said, infinite is not a number, is a word, so it’s like saying potato + 1 > potato
“potato” has a definition, and adding “1” just doesn’t make sense, the potato is still a plant, therefore still a potato
“infinite” has a definition too, and adding “1” doesn’t make sense either, infinite still has no end, therefore still infinite

You said it very well. Infinity is a concept. Numbers and concepts are oil and vinegar. The way hes' trying to do it is not only wrong to assume that the 1 disappears when it's added but that it could be added in the first place. It' would be like saying 1+prime number= prime number

I was assuming it was coding
As numbers and words can’t be together, it is an empty string (nule) so it just disappears

@Linspiring said in #38: > @AYUBALLENA said in #29: > First of all, infinite is not a number > Second: Period numbers, like π > π is an irrational number, since their decimals are infinite, and as you know, adding infinite things leads to infinite, but π starts off with 3 which is not infinite, also that you would be adding lesser numbers each time. > Third: infinite + 1 > infinite, as said, infinite is not a number, is a word, so it’s like saying potato + 1 > potato > “potato” has a definition, and adding “1” just doesn’t make sense, the potato is still a plant, therefore still a potato > “infinite” has a definition too, and adding “1” doesn’t make sense either, infinite still has no end, therefore still infinite > > You said it very well. Infinity is a concept. Numbers and concepts are oil and vinegar. The way hes' trying to do it is not only wrong to assume that the 1 disappears when it's added but that it could be added in the first place. It' would be like saying 1+prime number= prime number > I was assuming it was coding As numbers and words can’t be together, it is an empty string (nule) so it just disappears

@B11portezaallanklark said in #31:

#30 They, Mods just don't chatban people immeadetly, they squint lemon and alittle bazil leaves and voila! They cut onions in they're eyes and travel to Singapore and meet Alizera! (JK)

Alizera hmm is he another spelling mistake

@B11portezaallanklark said in #31: > #30 They, Mods just don't chatban people immeadetly, they squint lemon and alittle bazil leaves and voila! They cut onions in they're eyes and travel to Singapore and meet Alizera! (JK) Alizera hmm is he another spelling mistake

Proof that 0 / 0 = 8:
They look the same

Proof that 0 / 0 = 8: They look the same

@ChesstasticDude007 said in #44:

Proof that 0 / 0 = 8:
They look the same
Oh, about that:
12÷4=3 because 3x4=12
But if that’s so:
5÷0=0 because 0x0=5
Then 0x0=5!
Or:
12÷0=0 because 0x0=12
Then 0x0=12!

@ChesstasticDude007 said in #44: > Proof that 0 / 0 = 8: > They look the same Oh, about that: 12÷4=3 because 3x4=12 But if that’s so: 5÷0=0 because 0x0=5 Then 0x0=5! Or: 12÷0=0 because 0x0=12 Then 0x0=12!

@AYUBALLENA

I was assuming it was coding
As numbers and words can’t be together, it is an empty string (nule) so it just disappears
I think you know that it wasn't coding.

@AYUBALLENA > I was assuming it was coding > As numbers and words can’t be together, it is an empty string (nule) so it just disappears I think you know that it wasn't coding.

@AYUBALLENA said in #45:

@ChesstasticDude007 said in #44:
Proof that 0 / 0 = 8:
They look the same
Oh, about that:
12÷4=3 because 3x4=12
But if that’s so:
5÷0=0 because 0x0=5
Then 0x0=5!
Or:
12÷0=0 because 0x0=12
Then 0x0=12!

Exactly

@AYUBALLENA said in #45: > @ChesstasticDude007 said in #44: > Proof that 0 / 0 = 8: > They look the same > Oh, about that: > 12÷4=3 because 3x4=12 > But if that’s so: > 5÷0=0 because 0x0=5 > Then 0x0=5! > Or: > 12÷0=0 because 0x0=12 > Then 0x0=12! > Exactly

@ShAwN1708 said in #48:

I am very confused #1
Me too (HAHSHAHAHHAHHHAHAHAHSHHAJSH POTATO + 1 XD)

@ShAwN1708 said in #48: > I am very confused #1 Me too (HAHSHAHAHHAHHHAHAHAHSHHAJSH POTATO + 1 XD)

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.