You thought u did something very intelligent this time didn't you? But sorry to burst Ur bubble. Numerous sentences could be constructed without even uttering the first letter of the english lexicon.
Btw:1. Got this from yt lol
2. I think there is a grammar mistake. Shouldn't it be "Numerous sentences CAN be constructed...
Is it one or am I just blind?
#1 i do not understand what you're talking about.
When someone tells you they could write some sentence or some strings of words without the mentioned letter, you would roll your eyes or even smirk out of ridicule. It’s not possible, you’d murmur! But let me surprise you. You’re going to scrutinize long pieces of writing down below in the hunt for the mentioned letter, but you won’t find one. I promise!
Whole texts, even entire books were written without the first letter of the English lexicon. You being such impressed by my text, why don't you put an emoji at my comment?
I don't think you recognize how ToD works. You question if they reply "truth". And you tell them to do something is they reply otherwise.
Very difficult indeed. luckily this will not hold the letter. LOL it is still going wow incredible still not the letter. nowhere ever there will be the letter in this Reply for this topic it is fun so maybe I will try it one more time
@I_invented_google said in #13:
>why don't you put an emoji at my comment?
You used the first letter 2 times in one sentence.
THE FIRST ONE DOES NOT MAKE SENSE.
How bout this?
@atikshharsha2013 said in #17:
> THE FIRST ONE DOES NOT MAKE SENSE.
>
> How bout this?
isn't it about (don't make this count)
@masatoshi said in #18:
> isn't it about (don't make this count)
I said my sentence was: THE FIRST ONE DOES NOT MAKE SENSE.
then why did you add bout instead of about
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.