lichess.org
Donate

My new gambit!

My gambit is based on King's Gambit: 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4 g4 5. Ne5 Nf6 6. Nxf7? Kxf7. It is -2.1 so i don't think it is so bad. But as the Black's Kingside is weak, sometimes you can outplay them. Example: 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4 g4 5. Ne5 Nf6 6. Nxf7 Kxf7 7. d4 Nxe4 8. Bxf4 d5 9. Bd3 Nc6 10. O-O Kg8 11. Nd2 Nxd2 12. Qxd2 Be6 13. Rae1 Nxd4 14. Bg5 Qd7 15. Bf6 Bg7 16. Re5 Rf8 17. Bxg7 Rxf1+ 18. Bxf1 Qxg7 19. Rg5. The queen now is pinned and white has the advantage!

My gambit is based on King's Gambit: 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4 g4 5. Ne5 Nf6 6. Nxf7? Kxf7. It is -2.1 so i don't think it is so bad. But as the Black's Kingside is weak, sometimes you can outplay them. Example: 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4 g4 5. Ne5 Nf6 6. Nxf7 Kxf7 7. d4 Nxe4 8. Bxf4 d5 9. Bd3 Nc6 10. O-O Kg8 11. Nd2 Nxd2 12. Qxd2 Be6 13. Rae1 Nxd4 14. Bg5 Qd7 15. Bf6 Bg7 16. Re5 Rf8 17. Bxg7 Rxf1+ 18. Bxf1 Qxg7 19. Rg5. The queen now is pinned and white has the advantage!

-2.1 is losing.

-2.1 is losing.

Actually, the best move after nf6 is 6.Nxg4 . After Nxe4 White plays 7.d3! Ng3. In this position, White will sacrifice the ROOK by 8.Bxf4!!. After taking the rook, time for 9.Qe2+! Qe7! 10. Nf6+! Kd8 11.Bxc7+!! Kxc7 12. Nd5+! Kd8!. Then you take a queen and it is equal.

Actually, the best move after nf6 is 6.Nxg4 . After Nxe4 White plays 7.d3! Ng3. In this position, White will sacrifice the ROOK by 8.Bxf4!!. After taking the rook, time for 9.Qe2+! Qe7! 10. Nf6+! Kd8 11.Bxc7+!! Kxc7 12. Nd5+! Kd8!. Then you take a queen and it is equal.

Get OUTTT!! -2,1 is pathethical lOSIngf PoSIIITIOOOONNLOLLLLLLLLLLLL WHTA IS THIS guy Yappoing Abbouuuuutt

Get OUTTT!! -2,1 is pathethical lOSIngf PoSIIITIOOOONNLOLLLLLLLLLLLL WHTA IS THIS guy Yappoing Abbouuuuutt

Of course as a new gambit it is a losing pos. But Black's Kingside is quite weak. If they make a mistake, Black can punish them easily.

Of course as a new gambit it is a losing pos. But Black's Kingside is quite weak. If they make a mistake, Black can punish them easily.

Here is an example to make -2.1 to -0.6: 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4 g4 5. Ne5 Nf6 6. Nxf7 Kxf7 7. d4 Nxe4 8. Bxf4 d5 9. Bd3 Nc6 10. O-O Bf5 11. Be5 Nxe5 12. Rxf5+ Kg7 13. Bxe4 dxe4 14. Rxe5.

Here is an example to make -2.1 to -0.6: 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4 g4 5. Ne5 Nf6 6. Nxf7 Kxf7 7. d4 Nxe4 8. Bxf4 d5 9. Bd3 Nc6 10. O-O Bf5 11. Be5 Nxe5 12. Rxf5+ Kg7 13. Bxe4 dxe4 14. Rxe5.

@tpr said ^

-2.1 is losing.

yep! almost every new gambits show the losing positions.

@tpr said [^](/forum/redirect/post/OS9Zeqxl) > -2.1 is losing. yep! almost every new gambits show the losing positions.

#7
Basically every new "gambit" is an unsound gambit.

#7 Basically every new "gambit" is an unsound gambit.

Pretty much everyone who has invented a new gambit seems to think that the word gambit means something like: "A cheap trap that might catch unaware opponents of guard"

Pretty much everyone who has invented a new gambit seems to think that the word gambit means something like: "A cheap trap that might catch unaware opponents of guard"

@CG314 said ^

Pretty much everyone who has invented a new gambit seems to think that the word gambit means something like: "A cheap trap that might catch unaware opponents of guard"

Well, yes opponent can be smarter than we think. However they easily make the mistake in this gambit.

@CG314 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/jWsA06xT) > Pretty much everyone who has invented a new gambit seems to think that the word gambit means something like: "A cheap trap that might catch unaware opponents of guard" Well, yes opponent can be smarter than we think. However they easily make the mistake in this gambit.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.