<Comment deleted by user>
>
'' WHTA IS THIS guy Yappoing Abbouuuuutt''. That is what you said and I am not sastified about this.@LiDasher2012 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/e2DqrSN6)
> > > Get OUTTT!! -2,1 is pathethical lOSIngf PoSIIITIOOOONNLOLLLLLLLLLLLL WHTA IS THIS guy Yappoing Abbouuuuutt
> >
> > Like you bro. You negatively replied to my comment too. You know nothing. I might agree it's not the best opening, but any person with an actual future in this game could easily beat you in it. Honestly? nobody asked for your opinion and it's not worth it. You can keep spamming all you want but we will just start ignoring you.
>
> Only because I am negative about the OP doesn't mean no one asked for that position. You know what? I am just saying factually right things and I never said it wasn't a great weapon for blitz or rapid or smt else or bullet. I just wanted the OP to be aware that -2,1 position is pretty much losing for black and he didn't seem to know it. And saw the position myself and black can coutner it if they are not stupid
But LiDasher2012, you said:'' WHTA IS THIS guy Yappoing Abbouuuuutt". I am not sastified about this!
Yes that's basically not MY problem.
Read my comment again
.@LiDasher2012 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/3EOnFIYl)
> Yes that's basically not MY problem.
>
> Read my comment again
Ok, -2.1 is losing, but khoigambit12345 says it is not too bad.
This is an existing gambit, I believe it has the name of the Cotter Gambit in Lichess Opening Tree, and -2.1 is definitely losing but I can see people in maybe bullet or <2000 blitz losing to it, but a better try would be the Allagier, where it is only around -1.2 and has far better compensation, with the light squares being weaker and Black not having development of the knight.
Also maybe everyone can be a bit nicer? Yes the opening is bad but in a way, its not losing in the same way as other stuff, as the king is at least a bit weak. It is also interesting to see that this opening is named, and was probably used in the romantic era
It seems I was wrong, Cotter Gambit is actually a variation of the Allagier. I guess you could take credit for it, though I think you would have to beat a few masters with it before its named after you, so best of luck!
@FNQ_ChessPlayer said [^](/forum/redirect/post/7KJUHCay)
> It seems I was wrong, Cotter Gambit is actually a variation of the Allagier. I guess you could take credit for it, though I think you would have to beat a few masters with it before its named after you, so best of luck!
I have seen Cotter Gambit, Black plays h6 instead of Nf6. However, this guy doesn't make a bad gambit, so it can be accepted.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.