1900 thank you so much !!

@Sanjay-kurama said ^

I think I got my rival @aVague

Yes Like Kakashi and Gai

@aVague said ^

Of course game is simple and here is less to analyze, but it's interesting

Nothing interesting about a 15-move miniature in which someone hangs an M1.

It is indeed worth taking a closer look at such posts. The OP plays his games almost exclusively against stronger opponents and rarely competes against weaker ones. Furthermore, his win rate in rapid and blitz is roughly similar: on average, just 37%.

And that's exactly what we see here: every now and then, he proudly posts a victory against a 1900 player. If we look at the probability of winning for a player with 1500 points against a player with 1900 points, we see that the 1500 player has about a 10% chance of winning (i.e. 1 in 10 games). And that is then ‘marketed’ here.

How embarrassing some people find it that you have to post every victory against a higher rated opponent is something everyone has to decide for themselves – but it is what it is: sometimes you win and sometimes you lose; no magic.

@IamNOTamod said ^

Of course game is simple and here is less to analyze, but it's interesting

Nothing interesting about a 15-move miniature in which someone hangs an M1.

the fact u don't see nothing interesting, doesn't means everyone else doesn't too

@derkleineJo said ^

It is indeed worth taking a closer look at such posts. The OP plays his games almost exclusively against stronger opponents and rarely competes against weaker ones. Furthermore, his win rate in rapid and blitz is roughly similar: on average, just 37%.

And that's exactly what we see here: every now and then, he proudly posts a victory against a 1900 player. If we look at the probability of winning for a player with 1500 points against a player with 1900 points, we see that the 1500 player has about a 10% chance of winning (i.e. 1 in 10 games). And that is then ‘marketed’ here.

How embarrassing some people find it that you have to post every victory against a higher rated opponent is something everyone has to decide for themselves – but it is what it is: sometimes you win and sometimes you lose; no magic.

thnx for the support bro :)

@Sanjay-kurama said [...] thnx for the support bro :)

Actually, my opinion is quite different from yours. I can also understand @IamNOTamod point of view about the "spam" and I'm more on his/her side. But as I said, everyone has to decide for themselves.

Okay Sanjay

I am going to write one post with both of our games. What I think you should do though is instead of spamming game analysis, you should just create a study. Put the games in there with full analysis, and then just make a blog where people have the choice to look at it in a controlled format rather than game analysis spams. Blogs are definitely where you should be posting brag posts. And this is what you are doing. posting when you win against higher rated and pretending you are sorry for winning. It's Jr high level trolling. I would certainly respect it more if you just condence it into a study and post it on a titled blog. Even to the effect of rating level would be somewhat interesting. Like create a study and corresponding blog of ," How I am thrashing 1800-1900 players with ease as a 1500 player!" It would be better than this puke. I am deciding now if I should put our games in a blog or on here for game analysis. Because the more I think of it, the subject probably more deserves a blog feel. And the reason is, I want to include both of our games with full analysis, and I want to include three more to justify the previous analysis. And the subject is likely too big for "game analysis". My reasons for saying this to you is your spammy nature. Condensing it would make you look better.

@MeWantCookieMobile said ^

Okay Sanjay

I am going to write one post with both of our games. What I think you should do though is instead of spamming game analysis, you should just create a study. Put the games in there with full analysis, and then just make a blog where people have the choice to look at it in a controlled format rather than game analysis spams. Blogs are definitely where you should be posting brag posts. And this is what you are doing. posting when you win against higher rated and pretending you are sorry for winning. It's Jr high level trolling. I would certainly respect it more if you just condence it into a study and post it on a titled blog. Even to the effect of rating level would be somewhat interesting. Like create a study and corresponding blog of ," How I am thrashing 1800-1900 players with ease as a 1500 player!" It would be better than this puke. I am deciding now if I should put our games in a blog or on here for game analysis. Because the more I think of it, the subject probably more deserves a blog feel. And the reason is, I want to include both of our games with full analysis, and I want to include three more to justify the previous analysis. And the subject is likely too big for "game analysis". My reasons for saying this to you is your spammy nature. Condensing it would make you look better.

And (if I may say so), @aVague and @Brutal-baby could take a look at this advice too.

@IamNOTamod said ^

Okay Sanjay

I am going to write one post with both of our games. What I think you should do though is instead of spamming game analysis, you should just create a study. Put the games in there with full analysis, and then just make a blog where people have the choice to look at it in a controlled format rather than game analysis spams. Blogs are definitely where you should be posting brag posts. And this is what you are doing. posting when you win against higher rated and pretending you are sorry for winning. It's Jr high level trolling. I would certainly respect it more if you just condence it into a study and post it on a titled blog. Even to the effect of rating level would be somewhat interesting. Like create a study and corresponding blog of ," How I am thrashing 1800-1900 players with ease as a 1500 player!" It would be better than this puke. I am deciding now if I should put our games in a blog or on here for game analysis. Because the more I think of it, the subject probably more deserves a blog feel. And the reason is, I want to include both of our games with full analysis, and I want to include three more to justify the previous analysis. And the subject is likely too big for "game analysis". My reasons for saying this to you is your spammy nature. Condensing it would make you look better.

And (if I may say so), @aVague and @Brutal-baby could take a look at this advice too.

Why me and @aVague???
We invent our own way of chess strategies, psychology etc...
You can see our work & it's effectiveness.