lichess.org
Donate

mrpushwood has vanished

@Dukedog said in #51:

@morphyms1817

If nominated i will not run
If elected i will not serve

Don't remember who said that
But i don't want the job
'Shermanesque' - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shermanesque_statement - I remember when LBJ made a 'Shermanesque' statement when he decided not to seek reelection. - :]

@Dukedog said in #51: > @morphyms1817 > > If nominated i will not run > If elected i will not serve > > Don't remember who said that > But i don't want the job 'Shermanesque' - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shermanesque_statement - I remember when LBJ made a 'Shermanesque' statement when he decided not to seek reelection. - :]

@CSKA_Moscou Fear not.. there’s someone far more qualified than you my friend with more than enough time and wet keyboard ink at his disposal!

@CSKA_Moscou Fear not.. there’s someone far more qualified than you my friend with more than enough time and wet keyboard ink at his disposal!

@BorisOspasky said in #54:

@CSKA_Moscou Fear not.. there’s someone far more qualified than you my friend with more than enough time and wet keyboard ink at his disposal!

Ok! I give you this !

@BorisOspasky said in #54: > @CSKA_Moscou Fear not.. there’s someone far more qualified than you my friend with more than enough time and wet keyboard ink at his disposal! Ok! I give you this !

@CSKA_Moscou ps.. it’s not me.. it’s someone far far far more qualified that I :-) I’m but a 1200 v a GM :-)

@CSKA_Moscou ps.. it’s not me.. it’s someone far far far more qualified that I :-) I’m but a 1200 v a GM :-)

Gotta have a break after a while.

Gotta have a break after a while.

@BorisOspasky said in #56:

@CSKA_Moscou ps.. it’s not me.. it’s someone far far far more qualified that I :-) I’m but a 1200 v a GM :-)

quantity rather than quality: that's what @mrpushwood taught us to hate

@BorisOspasky said in #56: > @CSKA_Moscou ps.. it’s not me.. it’s someone far far far more qualified that I :-) I’m but a 1200 v a GM :-) quantity rather than quality: that's what @mrpushwood taught us to hate

The set of al currently sufficient Pushwood successors = the null set, which is unique.

However, there are perhaps some, a precious few, standing in the wings as possible "Pushwoods-in-waiting," who might, in time, ripen into truly Pushwoodian stature.

I can't be certain of that, because those are some mighty big boots to fill. And I will not name those inspiring and well-written individuals whom I suspect to have such long-term potential excellence, because I would not wish to make them blush upon receiving such high praise.

But in the best-of-all-possible-worlds, Pushwood would remain, unreplaced.

The set of al currently sufficient Pushwood successors = the null set, which is unique. However, there are perhaps some, a precious few, standing in the wings as possible "Pushwoods-in-waiting," who might, in time, ripen into truly Pushwoodian stature. I can't be certain of that, because those are some mighty big boots to fill. And I will not name those inspiring and well-written individuals whom I suspect to have such long-term potential excellence, because I would not wish to make them blush upon receiving such high praise. But in the best-of-all-possible-worlds, Pushwood would remain, unreplaced.

@Noflaps said in #59:

The set of al currently sufficient Pushwood successors = the null set, which is unique.

However, there are perhaps some, a precious few, standing in the wings as possible "Pushwoods-in-waiting," who might, in time, ripen into truly Pushwoodian stature.

I can't be certain of that, because those are some mighty big boots to fill. And I will not name those inspiring and well-written individuals whom I suspect to have such long-term potential excellence, because I would not wish to make them blush upon receiving such high praise.

But in the best-of-all-possible-worlds, Pushwood would remain, unreplaced.

any American or Scotsman chess player with a sense of humor and a chess title would be able to do that. Above all, it was the reactions he provoked that mades him unique.

given the tone of your message, I have serious fears regarding his possible return. do you have any info on that?

@Noflaps said in #59: > The set of al currently sufficient Pushwood successors = the null set, which is unique. > > However, there are perhaps some, a precious few, standing in the wings as possible "Pushwoods-in-waiting," who might, in time, ripen into truly Pushwoodian stature. > > I can't be certain of that, because those are some mighty big boots to fill. And I will not name those inspiring and well-written individuals whom I suspect to have such long-term potential excellence, because I would not wish to make them blush upon receiving such high praise. > > But in the best-of-all-possible-worlds, Pushwood would remain, unreplaced. any American or Scotsman chess player with a sense of humor and a chess title would be able to do that. Above all, it was the reactions he provoked that mades him unique. given the tone of your message, I have serious fears regarding his possible return. do you have any info on that?

@CSKA_Moscou , I have no information about that at all. So no need to feel worried because of anything I say. Ever.

@CSKA_Moscou , I have no information about that at all. So no need to feel worried because of anything I say. Ever.

@Noflaps said in #61:

@CSKA_Moscou , I have no information about that at all. So no need to feel worried because of anything I say. Ever.

the problem is not that I am worried, but that this is the result of my unconscious which asks me to ask a question which is only the question of the previous question without wanting to ask for an answer to the three, since the three questions do not deserve a rhetorical response. in short, everything is fine

@Noflaps said in #61: > @CSKA_Moscou , I have no information about that at all. So no need to feel worried because of anything I say. Ever. the problem is not that I am worried, but that this is the result of my unconscious which asks me to ask a question which is only the question of the previous question without wanting to ask for an answer to the three, since the three questions do not deserve a rhetorical response. in short, everything is fine

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.