the 180 + 180 game?

Just 300? lol. I would say lichess ratings are inflated up to 500-600. OTB is also mostly classical. Just because you're good at bullet doesn't mean you're good at OTB classical/ For example. Andrew tang is like 3150 bullet https://lichess.org/@/C9C9C9C9C9, but his OTB rating is 2550. In fact, I say that if you are better in bullet than rapid or classical, you're OTB rating will be much lower than you're bullet rating. Bullet only means you play fast, doesn't mean you play well. If you are lets say 2000 in bullet, you would lose to me in classical (if you are much better in bullet than classical.) (Im 1450-ish in OTB and online im 1300 ish.)

@Amanda_Nunes said in #10:

The main reason I would choose this over say for example, Correspondence, is that if my opponent falls asleep, they run out of time. In correspondence chess you have at least 24 hours for one move, plus people are legally allowed to cheat. In 180 180 it is still bound by the rules, but as long as you don't fall asleep you will not run out of time. The only reason why I don't do it is because people will actually let the clock run out just to troll you, so that's the drawback. But if you open multiple tabs and play a handful of games all at once, starting in the morning, you can have a bunch of good long games to play for hours. And you can watch you tube or whatever while you wait. You get a popup notification when it's your turn. If you play five games at once it works out pretty well. The rating should be your bullet rating plus 3-400. This is based upon a statistical rating analysis. So if your 1800 bullet you should expect about 2100-2200 classical. (on lichess, not OTB) Lichess ratings are overinflated by 300 points compared to OTB. Wait u are legally allowed to cheat in correspondence? That seems wrong

Also Fide rating is different to online rating so I don't think it would be that fair of a comparrison. And also nobody has ever acheived 3000 fide rating and It's kinda very very hard to get 3000 fide rating. But chess.com kinda has a more fide like rating system, 300 is the rating point difference i would say

@IndianDoraemon said in #4:

" 30 + 0 should be maximum time control."
?

-l;;=l-====-l''=[p====
'=' [p'p[l;'po[l'po[[[[[['[

p[lllllllllllllllllpol--[;'/;]'/];]//'\/\';.];/.]/'[;'/]/"{}/;[]/]/]'/}[;./'/]'/}
]/.././[]p./';./]pl[l]l=[=][lp=pl=l=pl=lp=plk0=-plk0=0pkp
[=kol]ok-]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]][p;[k-l[]lk
pl=[lplk-l-0000000ol0-p
pl=l;l;p-=-p;;[pll[p[pl[;lp=-=-==[p=-=p[-=lp0;
[p=-lpl=-[pl;plll.;;p[[pllpl=l=pl;pl][l=pl;lp;lplpolklpolkokl

@adamantmagician said in #13:

Also Fide rating is different to online rating so I don't think it would be that fair of a comparrison. And also nobody has ever acheived 3000 fide rating and It's kinda very very hard to get 3000 fide rating. But chess.com kinda has a more fide like rating system, 300 is the rating point difference i would say
https://imgur.com/a/QgYgEZr Based on over half a million confirmed players and rating these red lines give the average comparison between platforms.
And as far as correspondence goes, people can use data bases, opening book, etc. And also I don't believe there's a leader board because it's impossible to use cheat detection. People would argue they spent 7 days on that move. You don't seem to know what you're talking about but don't seem shy about giving your opinion. I guess that's reflected in your name.

I completely agree with that statement @Amanda_Nunes

Gotta admire those who play on that scale, tippin' ma hat to ya true chess fans

@Amanda_Nunes said in #10:

plus people are legally allowed to cheat.
Not really. See the FAQ: https://lichess.org/faq#correspondence