Your network blocks the Lichess assets!

lichess.org
Donate

Why is move 19 not a blunder?

<Comment deleted by user>

@weplaychess90 said in #20:

@Forgeron-de-Pion because you were already so bad and defeated in the game, that giving up the Queen doesn't give up the game, it was given much earlier.

It's another inaccuracy, only, in a game full of them.

Dude, at least get your details right if you're gonna be a jerk.

@weplaychess90 said in #20: > @Forgeron-de-Pion because you were already so bad and defeated in the game, that giving up the Queen doesn't give up the game, it was given much earlier. > > It's another inaccuracy, only, in a game full of them. Dude, at least get your details right if you're gonna be a jerk.

@weplaychess90 said in #20:

@Forgeron-de-Pion because you were already so bad
and defeated in the game, that giving up the Queen
doesn't give up the game, it was given much earlier. ...
As I read the report in #1, the evaluation was already over 6 points in favor of Forgeron-de-Pion before om1cron played 19 Bh5. httpscolon//lichessperiodorg/x8ZkIeHU/black

@weplaychess90 said in #20: > @Forgeron-de-Pion because you were already so bad > and defeated in the game, that giving up the Queen > doesn't give up the game, it was given much earlier. ... As I read the report in #1, the evaluation was already over 6 points in favor of Forgeron-de-Pion before om1cron played 19 Bh5. httpscolon//lichessperiodorg/x8ZkIeHU/black

@Forgeron-de-Pion said in #22:

Dude, at least get your details right if you're gonna be a jerk.

I was just explaining why it wasn't a blunder and you call me a jerk. I would delete my comment if you didn't quote it.

That's when you try to be helpful and the person gets arrogant and unwilling to be helped.

@Forgeron-de-Pion said in #22: > Dude, at least get your details right if you're gonna be a jerk. I was just explaining why it wasn't a blunder and you call me a jerk. I would delete my comment if you didn't quote it. That's when you try to be helpful and the person gets arrogant and unwilling to be helped.

@weplaychess90 said in #20:

@Forgeron-de-Pion ... you were already so bad and
defeated in the game, that giving up the Queen
doesn't give up the game, it was given much earlier. ...
That does not seem to be correct. Again, as I read the report in #1, the evaluation was already over 6 points in favor of Forgeron-de-Pion before om1cron played 19 Bh5. ("... 19 Bh5 (-6.17->-8.92) ...")
@weplaychess90 said in #24:
... you try to be helpful and the person
gets arrogant and unwilling to be helped.
As near as I can tell, Forgeron-de-Pion was trying to make you aware that you had made a mistake.

@weplaychess90 said in #20: > @Forgeron-de-Pion ... you were already so bad and > defeated in the game, that giving up the Queen > doesn't give up the game, it was given much earlier. ... That does not seem to be correct. Again, as I read the report in #1, the evaluation was already over 6 points in favor of Forgeron-de-Pion before om1cron played 19 Bh5. ("... 19 Bh5 (-6.17->-8.92) ...") @weplaychess90 said in #24: > ... you try to be helpful and the person > gets arrogant and unwilling to be helped. As near as I can tell, Forgeron-de-Pion was trying to make you aware that you had made a mistake.

@boilingFrog said in #18:

Move #19 is totally Incomprehensible. ~ Swami Vishgoda Svabooti

Actually, Swami Abevigoda.

@boilingFrog said in #18: > Move #19 is totally Incomprehensible. ~ Swami Vishgoda Svabooti Actually, Swami Abevigoda.

@ThunderClap said in #12:

Obviously White was already down a Piece & Two Pawns which means Black
is already Won & White should be on the Bus Home & have Resigned . ...
It was a 5+3 Blitz game.
httpscolon//lichessperiodorg/x8ZkIeHU

@ThunderClap said in #12: > Obviously White was already down a Piece & Two Pawns which means Black > is already Won & White should be on the Bus Home & have Resigned . ... It was a 5+3 Blitz game. httpscolon//lichessperiodorg/x8ZkIeHU

@kindaspongey said in #27:

It was a 5+3 Blitz game.
httpscolon//lichessperiodorg/x8ZkIeHU ... It was a 5+3 Blitz game

@kindaspongey said in #27: > It was a 5+3 Blitz game. > httpscolon//lichessperiodorg/x8ZkIeHU ... It was a 5+3 Blitz game

@weplaychess90 said in #24:

I was just explaining why it wasn't a blunder and you call me a jerk. I would delete my comment if you didn't quote it.

That's when you try to be helpful and the person gets arrogant and unwilling to be helped.

It's another inaccuracy, only, in a game full of them.

I don't see how that's not a jerk statement. "in a game full of them"? You know what you're doing. You're poking flames, so you can vilify the fire. i.e., intentionally trying to make me upset in the most polite way you can think of so you can pretend you did nothing wrong while I get all heated and angry and then you act like I'm just some rude prick beating on a guy who's "trying to help." Not a single thing you've said in this thread has been anything but condescending. And as far as "helpful" is considered, you didn't provide any perspectives that somebody else had already provided. And as far as "arrogant," I'm not arrogant, I'm offended. There's a difference.

@kindaspongey said in #25:

Thank you, again

That does not seem to be correct. Again, as I read the report in #1, the evaluation was already over 6 points in favor of Forgeron-de-Pion before om1cron played 19 Bh5. ("... 19 Bh5 (-6.17->-8.92) ...")

As near as I can tell, Forgeron-de-Pion was trying to make you aware that you had made a mistake.

I'm unsubscribing from the post and blocking weplaychess90.

@weplaychess90 said in #24: > I was just explaining why it wasn't a blunder and you call me a jerk. I would delete my comment if you didn't quote it. > > That's when you try to be helpful and the person gets arrogant and unwilling to be helped. >It's another inaccuracy, only, in a game full of them. I don't see how that's not a jerk statement. "in a game full of them"? You know what you're doing. You're poking flames, so you can vilify the fire. i.e., intentionally trying to make me upset in the most polite way you can think of so you can pretend you did nothing wrong while I get all heated and angry and then you act like I'm just some rude prick beating on a guy who's "trying to help." Not a single thing you've said in this thread has been anything but condescending. And as far as "helpful" is considered, you didn't provide any perspectives that somebody else had already provided. And as far as "arrogant," I'm not arrogant, I'm offended. There's a difference. @kindaspongey said in #25: Thank you, again > That does not seem to be correct. Again, as I read the report in #1, the evaluation was already over 6 points in favor of Forgeron-de-Pion before om1cron played 19 Bh5. ("... 19 Bh5 (-6.17->-8.92) ...") > > As near as I can tell, Forgeron-de-Pion was trying to make you aware that you had made a mistake. I'm unsubscribing from the post and blocking weplaychess90.

Oh my lord :)

Yeah, I must be a bad man.

Block me and leave lichess if you can, please.
Go to chess.com. It's better for newbies that are unwise and don't accept the truth.

I'm not your mother and I don't need to be lovely, only respectful, and that I was and I am.

For others: "Why is move 19 not a blunder?". Because blunder is a move that gives up the game, so the mistakes that were made before the move 19 are considered "blunder", only.
The player was already -6 points and a piece down when the move 19 happened.

That's it! I'll also unfollow this topic. Thank you for teaching me that.

Oh my lord :) Yeah, I must be a bad man. Block me and leave lichess if you can, please. Go to chess.com. It's better for newbies that are unwise and don't accept the truth. I'm not your mother and I don't need to be lovely, only respectful, and that I was and I am. For others: "Why is move 19 not a blunder?". Because blunder is a move that gives up the game, so the mistakes that were made before the move 19 are considered "blunder", only. The player was already -6 points and a piece down when the move 19 happened. That's it! I'll also unfollow this topic. Thank you for teaching me that.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.