lichess.org
Donate

The Declining Quality of Lichess Studies

Ai slop has also come in blogs in the top page

Ai slop has also come in blogs in the top page
<Comment deleted by user>

It's kind of ironic that the list of recommended studies that you include also mostly contains very low quality stuff

It's kind of ironic that the list of recommended studies that you include also mostly contains very low quality stuff

You forgot to add the Crush the Caro-Kann to the list.
Nice research!

You forgot to add the Crush the Caro-Kann to the list. Nice research!

@HighlyCruciferous said:

It's kind of ironic that the list of recommended studies that you include also mostly contains very low quality stuff

Such as...

@HighlyCruciferous said: > It's kind of ironic that the list of recommended studies that you include also mostly contains very low quality stuff Such as...

@Phil224 said:

@HighlyCruciferous said:

It's kind of ironic that the list of recommended studies that you include also mostly contains very low quality stuff

Such as...

Most of it
No depth to the analysis, no illustrative games, very few truly original, novel or even interesting ideas
These studies almost all follow the same format of pseudo-interactive shallow superficial hogwash
Sorry if this is harsh but I feel that the title of this blog justifies it

@Phil224 said: > @HighlyCruciferous said: > > It's kind of ironic that the list of recommended studies that you include also mostly contains very low quality stuff > > Such as... Most of it No depth to the analysis, no illustrative games, very few truly original, novel or even interesting ideas These studies almost all follow the same format of pseudo-interactive shallow superficial hogwash Sorry if this is harsh but I feel that the title of this blog justifies it

https://lichess.org/study/H5tPLlnU

Skyrocket your Rating! PART 2

https://lichess.org/study/H5tPLlnU Skyrocket your Rating! PART 2

@HighlyCruciferous said:

Most of it
No depth to the analysis, no illustrative games, very few truly original, novel or even interesting ideas
These studies almost all follow the same format of pseudo-interactive shallow superficial hogwash
Sorry if this is harsh but I feel that the title of this blog justifies it

Any examples?
(And suggestions for the study creators to improve?)

@HighlyCruciferous said: > > Most of it > No depth to the analysis, no illustrative games, very few truly original, novel or even interesting ideas > These studies almost all follow the same format of pseudo-interactive shallow superficial hogwash > Sorry if this is harsh but I feel that the title of this blog justifies it Any examples? (And suggestions for the study creators to improve?)