lichess.org
Donate

2026 AWC Rounds and Results

I'm pretty sure there is a mistake in the pairings, I'm listed as seed 4 and sut is listed as seed 3, even tho im about 70 rating points higher seeded than him. Please correct me if I'm wrong but it appears like the pairings are messed up, also because they don't match the pairings on atomicpuzzles.org. Of course it would make sense to assume that atomicpuzzles.org has the wrong pairings, but as I said, I'm seeded wrongly on challonge so I suspect there might be a slight mistake there.

I'm pretty sure there is a mistake in the pairings, I'm listed as seed 4 and sut is listed as seed 3, even tho im about 70 rating points higher seeded than him. Please correct me if I'm wrong but it appears like the pairings are messed up, also because they don't match the pairings on atomicpuzzles.org. Of course it would make sense to assume that atomicpuzzles.org has the wrong pairings, but as I said, I'm seeded wrongly on challonge so I suspect there might be a slight mistake there.

@ReChesster said ^

I'm pretty sure there is a mistake in the pairings, I'm listed as seed 4 and sut is listed as seed 3, even tho im about 70 rating points higher seeded than him. Please correct me if I'm wrong but it appears like the pairings are messed up, also because they don't match the pairings on atomicpuzzles.org. Of course it would make sense to assume that atomicpuzzles.org has the wrong pairings, but as I...

Yes there was a mistake, thank you for noticing. It is fixed now, but all existing predictions have been reset. @DanDan2016 @hypercamel

@ReChesster said [^](/forum/redirect/post/dIp4qP0G) > I'm pretty sure there is a mistake in the pairings, I'm listed as seed 4 and sut is listed as seed 3, even tho im about 70 rating points higher seeded than him. Please correct me if I'm wrong but it appears like the pairings are messed up, also because they don't match the pairings on atomicpuzzles.org. Of course it would make sense to assume that atomicpuzzles.org has the wrong pairings, but as I... Yes there was a mistake, thank you for noticing. It is fixed now, but all existing predictions have been reset. @DanDan2016 @hypercamel

@RabbieR said ^

@levi_blythe

If im understanding correctly you would like the first game of any of the matches? If so heres the first game of accaesar and i's match :)

https://lichess.org/zhayquaLDuU6

@RabbieR, @HowlinD Thanks a lot! That's exactly what I wanted. Blogs are in progress... (sadly I am very busy these days).

One more question to Howlin. Does the match between max and sirca already count? Seems a bit odd that we would predict for it :)

@RabbieR said [^](/forum/redirect/post/Jk7McKCt) > @levi_blythe > > If im understanding correctly you would like the first game of any of the matches? If so heres the first game of accaesar and i's match :) https://lichess.org/zhayquaLDuU6 @RabbieR, @HowlinD Thanks a lot! That's exactly what I wanted. Blogs are in progress... (sadly I am very busy these days). One more question to Howlin. Does the match between max and sirca already count? Seems a bit odd that we would predict for it :)

Yes, max-sirca has already been played, and counts. For predictions, consider it a guaranteed result.

Yes, max-sirca has already been played, and counts. For predictions, consider it a guaranteed result.

@HowlinD said ^

Yes, max-sirca has already been played, and counts. For predictions, consider it a guaranteed result.

where on earth was max vs sirca

@HowlinD said [^](/forum/redirect/post/d68Ae3d9) > Yes, max-sirca has already been played, and counts. For predictions, consider it a guaranteed result. where on earth was max vs sirca

Maracker vs RabbieR rescheduling

Maracker vs RabbieR rescheduling

@ReChesster wins against @RenaudMerle 6.5-5.5, ggs

First game:

https://lichess.org/game/PbyUkbwU/black

@ReChesster wins against @RenaudMerle 6.5-5.5, ggs First game: https://lichess.org/game/PbyUkbwU/black

Join the Atomic WC team, to post in this forum