Introducing: Analyses of all Games • page 1/1 • Crazyhouse World Championship • lichess.org

See: https://en.lichess.org/forum/team-crazyhouse-world-championship/qualification-tournament-prizes

For the purpose of certain prizes*, and for general benefit of the crazyhouse community, I have decided to analyze all games of all matches. Expect the analyses for the qualification round to be here quite soon. * See: https://en.lichess.org/forum/team-crazyhouse-world-championship/qualification-tournament-prizes

NM FischyVishy

edited

I should clarify that the analyses will be done by FVSF. What is FVSF? Well :P: FischyVishy + Stockfish Crazyhouse, an amazing cyborg team!

An inaccuracy will be defined as a change of evaluation of +-1.00 with an error of +-0.1 (so if SF gives a change of evaluation from 1.2 to 2.1, this might still be an inaccuracy). Of course, my human knowledge will help me know when SF is just being stupid - if the evaluation changes from 8.2 to 9.3, for example, or if the evaluation changes by 1.2 for a clearly normal move (In such a case, it will be clear to me that SF will change its mind at higher depths, and of course I'll run such higher depth tests to make sure.), I will know that SF really isn't properly evaluating a move as an inaccuracy.

I should clarify that the analyses will be done by FVSF. What is FVSF? Well :P: FischyVishy + Stockfish Crazyhouse, an amazing cyborg team! An inaccuracy will be defined as a change of evaluation of +-1.00 with an error of +-0.1 (so if SF gives a change of evaluation from 1.2 to 2.1, this might still be an inaccuracy). Of course, my human knowledge will help me know when SF is just being stupid - if the evaluation changes from 8.2 to 9.3, for example, or if the evaluation changes by 1.2 for a clearly normal move (In such a case, it will be clear to me that SF will change its mind at higher depths, and of course I'll run such higher depth tests to make sure.), I will know that SF really isn't properly evaluating a move as an inaccuracy.