@Vyom_captain said in #5:
Chess.com has a lot so maybe lichess can take the most popular ones and put them in the lichess website and app
And what goal should that serve ?
@Vyom_captain said in #5:
> Chess.com has a lot so maybe lichess can take the most popular ones and put them in the lichess website and app
And what goal should that serve ?
@Vyom_captain said in #5:
Chess.com has a lot so maybe lichess can take the most popular ones and put them in the lichess website and app
Yes
@Vyom_captain said in #5:
> Chess.com has a lot so maybe lichess can take the most popular ones and put them in the lichess website and app
Yes
@BoRyS_PrO_2015 said in #12:
Yes
But why ? I am really interested in knowing the answer to that
@BoRyS_PrO_2015 said in #12:
> Yes
But why ? I am really interested in knowing the answer to that
@fredo599 said in #13:
But why ? I am really interested in knowing the answer to that
More variants - is always good, why not borrow it in https://chess.com/ ?
@fredo599 said in #13:
> But why ? I am really interested in knowing the answer to that
More variants - is always good, why not borrow it in https://chess.com/ ?
@BoRyS_PrO_2015 said in #14:
More variants - is always good, why not borrow it in chess.com/ ?
I am a contributor to lichess and I can tell you why I, personally, would not spend time on that.
The variant exists and you can play it on chess.com ... so why would I spend time so that you can play it on lichess ?
@BoRyS_PrO_2015 said in #14:
> More variants - is always good, why not borrow it in chess.com/ ?
I am a contributor to lichess and I can tell you why I, personally, would not spend time on that.
The variant exists and you can play it on chess.com ... so why would I spend time so that you can play it on lichess ?
In https://lichess.org/ more convenient
@BoRyS_PrO_2015 said in #16:
In lichess.org/ more convenient
This is nice to hear. Why do you think it is more convenient?
@BoRyS_PrO_2015 said in #16:
> In lichess.org/ more convenient
This is nice to hear. Why do you think it is more convenient?
@fredo599 said in #17:
This is nice to hear. Why do you think it is more convenient?
I dont understand how use https://chess.com/
@fredo599 said in #17:
> This is nice to hear. Why do you think it is more convenient?
I dont understand how use https://chess.com/
@thibault?
maybe bughouse
@fredo599 said in #17:
This is nice to hear. Why do you think it is more convenient?
Chess.com is paid
@fredo599 said in #17:
> This is nice to hear. Why do you think it is more convenient?
Chess.com is paid