Once I reported an account with 100% accuracy and he didn't get banned. Lichess doesn't care lol
@Nulia926 said in #91:
> Once I reported an account with 100% accuracy and he didn't get banned. Lichess doesn't care lol
High accuracy doesn't mean cheating. A common misconception. I quite often have high accuracy games, it usually is just a boring game or a game where my opponent made an opening mistake.
@Molurus said in #92:
> I know, I also have high accuracy games but 100%? That's cheating.
@Nulia926
No, 100% is not cheating by definition. In fact, accuracy is a very poor indicator if you want to identify cheaters.
PS: a 100% game is actually quite rare, do you have a game link? Honestly, I don't think the analysis engine could/would play a 100% game, simply because of horizon effects in the analysis. I've seen a few 99% games, but 100... never, I think.
@Molurus said in #94:
> @Nulia926
>
> No, 100% is not cheating by definition. In fact, accuracy is a very poor indicator if you want to identify cheaters.
He also had really low average centipawn loss
lichess im not losing on purpose my game is making me lose cause of lag i cant play i make 1 and it makes me replay and lose
@RICHMOND45 said in #96:
> lichess im not losing on purpose my game is making me lose cause of lag i cant play i make 1 and it makes me replay and lose
If you have received a warning from Lichess you can go to lichess.org/appeal
@Molurus said in #94:
> @Nulia926
>
> No, 100% is not cheating by definition. In fact, accuracy is a very poor indicator if you want to identify cheaters.
>
> PS: a 100% game is actually quite rare, do you have a game link? Honestly, I don't think the analysis engine could/would play a 100% game, simply because of horizon effects in the analysis. I've seen a few 99% games, but 100... never, I think.
A Player could have just played a very good game, playing the best moves possible. That sometimes happens in short games or rarely in long games but that's extremely rare. Players can study positions for hours to find the best moves possible and then play games like that.
@xEliteFirex said in #98:
> A Player could have just played a very good game, playing the best moves possible. That sometimes happens in short games or rarely in long games but that's extremely rare. Players can study positions for hours to find the best moves possible and then play games like that.
Well, here's the thing: the analysis engine wouldn't even recognize the best moves. It already has an opinion on the most comonly played book moves that is not 'flawless', even though it doesn't suggest other moves. This, in part, has to do with just the limited time it uses, and it seeing different evals on followup moves.
So if you've ever seen a 100% game, I'd love to see it. Never seen one, not even if you play 'the best possible moves'.
@Molurus said in #99:
> Well, here's the thing: the analysis engine wouldn't even recognize the best moves. It already has an opinion on the most comonly played book moves that is not 'flawless', even though it doesn't suggest other moves. This, in part, has to do with just the limited time it uses, and it seeing different evals on followup moves.
>
> So if you've ever seen a 100% game, I'd love to see it. Never seen one, not even if you play 'the best possible moves'.
I've seen a 98.0 percent game.