@woodfantasy said ^
Felt that blunder in my bones. You dominate the whole middlegame and one blind spot ruins the party. Keep your head up!
the "blunder" wasnt that bad , and it did not cost me the game if thats what you mean 
@woodfantasy said [^](/forum/redirect/post/YunJlkZu)
> Felt that blunder in my bones. You dominate the whole middlegame and one blind spot ruins the party. Keep your head up!
the "blunder" wasnt that bad , and it did not cost me the game if thats what you mean 
Anyway don’t worry about inaccuracies tactics at this stage are more important
Anyway don’t worry about inaccuracies tactics at this stage are more important
@FRANCIS_O said ^
Anyway don’t worry about inaccuracies tactics at this stage are more important
i do alot of puzzles (1900-2000) but still often miss tactics in games , is this normal ?
@FRANCIS_O said [^](/forum/redirect/post/STVd0Ll3)
> Anyway don’t worry about inaccuracies tactics at this stage are more important
i do alot of puzzles (1900-2000) but still often miss tactics in games , is this normal ?
"i do alot of puzzles (1900-2000) but still often miss tactics in games"
- How much time do you spend solving a puzzle?
How much time do you spend on a move in a game?
"i do alot of puzzles (1900-2000) but still often miss tactics in games"
* How much time do you spend solving a puzzle?
How much time do you spend on a move in a game?
@tpr said ^
"i do alot of puzzles (1900-2000) but still often miss tactics in games"
- How much time do you spend solving a puzzle?
How much time do you spend on a move in a game?
5-7 min , if i do it quicker with a bit intuition then i usually fail at the puzzle ( i lost many puzzles like that )
if i see that its a complex position with tactics then 1-3 min , if not then under a minute
@tpr said [^](/forum/redirect/post/wKpM7NQI)
> "i do alot of puzzles (1900-2000) but still often miss tactics in games"
> * How much time do you spend solving a puzzle?
> How much time do you spend on a move in a game?
5-7 min , if i do it quicker with a bit intuition then i usually fail at the puzzle ( i lost many puzzles like that )
if i see that its a complex position with tactics then 1-3 min , if not then under a minute
"5-7 min , if i do it quicker with a bit intuition then i usually fail"
"if i see that its a complex position with tactics then 1-3 min"
- That explains it. In a game you should use more time per move than to solve a puzzle.
In a game you do not know if there is a tactic, or for whom, so you have to assume there is one until you have ascertained yourself there is none.
Play a slower time control.
"5-7 min , if i do it quicker with a bit intuition then i usually fail"
"if i see that its a complex position with tactics then 1-3 min"
* That explains it. In a game you should use more time per move than to solve a puzzle.
In a game you do not know if there is a tactic, or for whom, so you have to assume there is one until you have ascertained yourself there is none.
Play a slower time control.
Here is an example:
https://lichess.org/dwmAks4m/black#37
You play the blunder Bxa3?? and miss the double attack Qa4.You still had 13 minutes in this 15+10 game to find the winning Bc5.If you are winning, and you have 13 minutes, then spend 1-3 min or 5-7 min on a move.
Here is an example:
https://lichess.org/dwmAks4m/black#37
You play the blunder Bxa3?? and miss the double attack Qa4.
You still had 13 minutes in this 15+10 game to find the winning Bc5.
If you are winning, and you have 13 minutes, then spend 1-3 min or 5-7 min on a move.
@tpr said ^
"5-7 min , if i do it quicker with a bit intuition then i usually fail"
"if i see that its a complex position with tactics then 1-3 min"
- That explains it. In a game you should use more time per move than to solve a puzzle.
In a game you do not know if there is a tactic, or for whom, so you have to assume there is one until you have ascertained yourself there is none.
Play a slower time control.
classic chess is too boring besides maybe 30 which is kind of ok
@tpr said [^](/forum/redirect/post/Xno1fR2Z)
> "5-7 min , if i do it quicker with a bit intuition then i usually fail"
> "if i see that its a complex position with tactics then 1-3 min"
> * That explains it. In a game you should use more time per move than to solve a puzzle.
> In a game you do not know if there is a tactic, or for whom, so you have to assume there is one until you have ascertained yourself there is none.
> Play a slower time control.
classic chess is too boring besides maybe 30 which is kind of ok
"classic chess is too boring"
- And 5-7 minutes on 1 puzzle is not boring?
"classic chess is too boring"
* And 5-7 minutes on 1 puzzle is not boring?
@tpr said ^
Here is an example:
https://lichess.org/dwmAks4m/black#37
You play the blunder Bxa3?? and miss the double attack Qa4.
You still had 13 minutes in this 15+10 game to find the winning Bc5.
If you are winning, and you have 13 minutes, then spend 1-3 min or 5-7 min on a move.
i admit this was very bad played from me
@tpr said [^](/forum/redirect/post/aDzV8QP9)
> Here is an example:
> https://lichess.org/dwmAks4m/black#37
> You play the blunder Bxa3?? and miss the double attack Qa4.
> You still had 13 minutes in this 15+10 game to find the winning Bc5.
> If you are winning, and you have 13 minutes, then spend 1-3 min or 5-7 min on a move.
i admit this was very bad played from me
