is the lichess or chess.com game analysis better ?
Lichess analysis is more accurate.
Both interpretations of the evaluation are poor.
@tpr said [^](/forum/redirect/post/ovWDbFjf)
> Lichess analysis is more accurate.
> Both interpretations of the evaluation are poor.
is it because the chess.com game analysis still uses stockfish 16 with only 5 sec of analyzing time ? , or did they chanche that
I do not care about the other site.
Yes they use an older version of engine.
They provide better analysis to paying members.
They have a whole slew of meaningless !, !!, !? etc.
They throw ! as if it were cookies.
@tpr said [^](/forum/redirect/post/wMrVU9f7)
> I do not care about the other site.
> Yes they use an older version of engine.
> They provide better analysis to paying members.
> They have a whole slew of meaningless !, !!, !? etc.
> They throw ! as if it were cookies.
good point lol
[Event "rated rapid game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/WxfvzxSE"] [Date "2026.10.08"] [Black "Roswitha2"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "900+10"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bb5 a6 4 Ba4 Nf6 5 O-O Bc5 6 Re1 O-O 7 c3 b5 8 Bb3 Na5 9 Bc2 Nc4 10 d3 Nd6 11 d4 exd4 12 cxd4 Bb4 13 Bd2?? (6.14 2.46) Blunder. Nc3 was best. (13 Nc3 Bxc3 14 bxc3 Nde8 15 e5 Nd5 16 Bg5 f6 17 Qd3 g6 18 Bb3 Bb7)
For the machine, it seems that what really gets the electrons flowing is the prospect of something like 19 exf6 Nxf6 20 Ne5 Qe8 21 c4 bxc4 22 Bxc4 Kh8 23 Rab1 Nb6 24 d5 Nxc4 25 Qxc4 Bxd5 26 Bxf6+ Rxf6 27 Qxd5 Te6 28 Kf1 Qf8 29 Qxd7 Rf6 30 Qd4 Qg7 31 Rbd1 Rg8 32 f3 a5 33 Qc3 Rff8 34 Rd7 Qf6 35 Red1 h6 36 Rxc7 Rg7 37 Rxg7 Kxg7 38 Rd7+ Kg8 39 Qc4+ Kh8 40 Nf7+ Qxf7 41 Rxf7