What is better - to think for hours or to play on intuition?
intuition is much better
But sometimes we need long thinking games to create a neural base for the intuition to work with in fast games.
You have many exciting questions.
Why don't you make a list of your questions like a questionnaire and we can answer them all in one post?
@Tlilchantli said [^](/forum/redirect/post/IpEKOhhj)
> Интуиция гораздо лучше. Но иногда нам нужны длительные мыслительные игры, чтобы создать нейронную базу, с которой интуиция сможет работать в быстрых играх. У вас много интересных вопросов. Почему бы вам не составить список ваших вопросов в виде анкеты, и мы сможем ответить на них все в одном посте?
Great idea
Banana vs orange/apple?
Intuition for rapid and blitz is grown by playing classical and analyzing.
#1: Better for what? Improvement or enjoyment? For the former, Classical; for the latter, it is subjective.
Not for lichess, but Magnus Carlsen preferred a greater emphasis on rapid and blitz should be integrated at the elite level.
"Magnus Carlsen preferred a greater emphasis on rapid and blitz "
* Because he is the best at those and got lazy about classical.
Classical on lichess is bad because ppl can stall time and yuo have. To be waiting abosulutetly forever and its boring
you can not stall time rapid and blitz
( sorry for any wrong spelling )
@tpr said [^](/forum/redirect/post/C5ZL1QlF)
> "Magnus Carlsen preferred a greater emphasis on rapid and blitz "
> * Because he is the best at those and got lazy about classical.
he is also the best at classical though lol