lichess.org
Donate

How do I actually understand an endgame position?

KMcGeoch

@TheDifferenceOfTier5 said ^

Yeah but for a lot of positions I come across, the engine says that only one move wins or draws, and I don't see why it has to be those ones.

It's down to endgame theory. To fully understand it you need to know theory and which positions are winning and which are drawn. However often a key theme is the opposition or zugzwang. For example in a K+P vs K endgame if it's a drawn position you'll often only have 1 drawing move but if you understand opposition or key squares you'll know why they move is essential.

If you don't understand it then play correct line with engine, then try to play similarly with an incorrect move and the engine should point out the flaw that meant only 1 move worked.

@TheDifferenceOfTier5 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/ixfuTETi) > Yeah but for a lot of positions I come across, the engine says that only one move wins or draws, and I don't see why it has to be those ones. It's down to endgame theory. To fully understand it you need to know theory and which positions are winning and which are drawn. However often a key theme is the opposition or zugzwang. For example in a K+P vs K endgame if it's a drawn position you'll often only have 1 drawing move but if you understand opposition or key squares you'll know why they move is essential. If you don't understand it then play correct line with engine, then try to play similarly with an incorrect move and the engine should point out the flaw that meant only 1 move worked.
kindaspongey

@TheDifferenceOfTier5 said in #10:

... There were other games where that happened, not just that one

How about this one?
[Event "rated bullet game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/KwLHETjp"] [Date "2026.09.03"] [White "akima12"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "60+0"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1 e4 e5 2 Bc4 Nf6 3 d3 Nc6 4 Bg5 Be7 5 Nc3 O-O 6 Bxf6 Bxf6 7 Nd5 Bg5 8 Nh3 Be7 9 Nxe7+ Qxe7 10 O-O d6 11 Qh5 Bxh3 12 Qxh3 Nd4 13 c3 Ne6 14 Bxe6 fxe6 15 Qe3 a6 16 f4 exf4 17 Rxf4 Rxf4 18 Qxf4 Rf8 19 Qe3 e5 20 Rf1 Rxf1+ 21 Kxf1 Qf6+ 22 Qf3 Qxf3+ 23 gxf3 Kf7 24 Kf2 Kg6 25 Kg3 Kg5 26 d4 Kf6 27 d5 g6 28 Kg4 h6 29 h4 h5+ 30 Kg3 g5 31 c4 gxh4+ 32 Kxh4 Kg6 33 b4 b6 34 a4 a5 35 b5 Kh6 36 Kh3 Kg6 37 Kg3 Kg5 38 Kh3 h4 39 Kg2 Kh5 (-7.62 —> -0.06) Kf4 was best.
39...Kf4 40 Kf2 h3 would have left akima12 with the serious problem of trying to simultaneously protect the f3-pawn and stop your h-pawn.
39...Kh5 gave akima12 the opportunity to eliminate the weakness at f4 with 40 f4 exf4 41 e5.

@TheDifferenceOfTier5 said in #10: > ... There were other games where that happened, not just that one How about this one? [Event "rated bullet game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/KwLHETjp"] [Date "2026.09.03"] [White "akima12"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "60+0"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1 e4 e5 2 Bc4 Nf6 3 d3 Nc6 4 Bg5 Be7 5 Nc3 O-O 6 Bxf6 Bxf6 7 Nd5 Bg5 8 Nh3 Be7 9 Nxe7+ Qxe7 10 O-O d6 11 Qh5 Bxh3 12 Qxh3 Nd4 13 c3 Ne6 14 Bxe6 fxe6 15 Qe3 a6 16 f4 exf4 17 Rxf4 Rxf4 18 Qxf4 Rf8 19 Qe3 e5 20 Rf1 Rxf1+ 21 Kxf1 Qf6+ 22 Qf3 Qxf3+ 23 gxf3 Kf7 24 Kf2 Kg6 25 Kg3 Kg5 26 d4 Kf6 27 d5 g6 28 Kg4 h6 29 h4 h5+ 30 Kg3 g5 31 c4 gxh4+ 32 Kxh4 Kg6 33 b4 b6 34 a4 a5 35 b5 Kh6 36 Kh3 Kg6 37 Kg3 Kg5 38 Kh3 h4 39 Kg2 Kh5 (-7.62 —> -0.06) Kf4 was best. 39...Kf4 40 Kf2 h3 would have left akima12 with the serious problem of trying to simultaneously protect the f3-pawn and stop your h-pawn. 39...Kh5 gave akima12 the opportunity to eliminate the weakness at f4 with 40 f4 exf4 41 e5.
TheDifferenceOfTier5

@kindaspongey said ^

... There were other games where that happened, not just that one

How about this one?
[Event "rated bullet game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/KwLHETjp"] [Date "2026.09.03"] [White "akima12"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "60+0"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1 e4 e5 2 Bc4 Nf6 3 d3 Nc6 4 Bg5 Be7 5 Nc3 O-O 6 Bxf6 Bxf6 7 Nd5 Bg5 8 Nh3 Be7 9 Nxe7+ Qxe7 10 O-O d6 11...

That is a bullet game. I just play bullet for mindless fun, not seriously.
But I have lost several serious games due to misplaying endgames.

@kindaspongey said [^](/forum/redirect/post/dObE26vR) > > ... There were other games where that happened, not just that one > > How about this one? > [Event "rated bullet game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/KwLHETjp"] [Date "2026.09.03"] [White "akima12"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "60+0"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1 e4 e5 2 Bc4 Nf6 3 d3 Nc6 4 Bg5 Be7 5 Nc3 O-O 6 Bxf6 Bxf6 7 Nd5 Bg5 8 Nh3 Be7 9 Nxe7+ Qxe7 10 O-O d6 11... That is a bullet game. I just play bullet for mindless fun, not seriously. But I have lost several serious games due to misplaying endgames.
TheDifferenceOfTier5

@KMcGeoch said ^

Yeah but for a lot of positions I come across, the engine says that only one move wins or draws, and I don't see why it has to be those ones.

It's down to endgame theory. To fully understand it you need to know theory and which positions are winning and which are drawn. However often a key theme is the opposition or zugzwang. For exa...

I understand opposition and key squares. That's not what will help me. I'm talking about non theoretical endgames.

@KMcGeoch said [^](/forum/redirect/post/H4cW5Jp9) > > Yeah but for a lot of positions I come across, the engine says that only one move wins or draws, and I don't see why it has to be those ones. > > It's down to endgame theory. To fully understand it you need to know theory and which positions are winning and which are drawn. However often a key theme is the opposition or zugzwang. For exa... I understand opposition and key squares. That's not what will help me. I'm talking about non theoretical endgames.
kindaspongeyedited

@TheDifferenceOfTier5 said in #13:

... That is a bullet game. I just play bullet for mindless fun, not seriously.
But I have lost several serious games due to misplaying endgames.

Well, bullet or not, it is an example of how things can go wrong in one move of an endgame. Perhaps, let us know if you decide that there is a specific game (and specific move) that you would like others to examine.

@TheDifferenceOfTier5 said in #13: > ... That is a bullet game. I just play bullet for mindless fun, not seriously. > But I have lost several serious games due to misplaying endgames. Well, bullet or not, it is an example of how things can go wrong in one move of an endgame. Perhaps, let us know if you decide that there is a specific game (and specific move) that you would like others to examine.
fallboss007

endgameqs are 10x more important than openings. The main goal in endgames is to make a queen and not letting the opponent doing one

endgameqs are 10x more important than openings. The main goal in endgames is to make a queen and not letting the opponent doing one
ChessPriyomeedited

I TRULY HOPE THIS HELPS YOU BECOME A LITTLE BETTER AT ENDGAME PLAY.

Seems like you want a step by step method (AI Assisted, Edited, no apologies).

Material King Activity Pawn Structure Passed Pawns Piece Activity Plans Calculation

Evaluate the position systematically. Act like a Strong player.

1. Count Material

Ask:

Who has more pawns?
Are there any passed pawns?
Is one side up a piece?

Material tells you what kind of endgame you're dealing with and whether you should play for a win or a draw.

2. Evaluate the Kings

In endgames, the king becomes an attacking piece. Act like a Strong Player.

Check:

Which king is more active?
Can a king penetrate into the opponent's position?
Who controls key entry squares?

A more active king is often worth more than a pawn.

3. Identify Pawn Structure

Look for:

Passed pawns
Isolated pawns
Doubled pawns
Backward pawns
Pawn majorities

Passed pawns are usually the most important feature of an endgame. Act like a Strong Player.

4. Find the Critical Squares

Ask:

Where do the kings want to go?
Which squares must be controlled?
Are there opposition or triangulation opportunities?

In king-and-pawn endings, a single square often determines the result. Act like a Strong Player.

5. Compare Piece Activity

If pieces remain on the board:

Which rook is more active?
Which bishop has better scope?
Which knight has stronger outposts?

Activity is often more important than raw material in endgames. Act like a Strong Player.

6. Calculate Pawn Races

When passed pawns exist, calculate:

How many moves until promotion?
Can the king stop the pawn?
Does a piece need to sacrifice itself?

A quick method is to count moves and use the "square of the pawn" rule in king-and-pawn endings. Act like a Strong Player.

7. Assess Winning Plans

After evaluating the position, determine the main plans:

For example:

Activate the king
Create a passed pawn
Win an enemy pawn
Trade into a favorable king-and-pawn ending
Put a rook behind a passed pawn

8. Calculate Concrete Variations

Only after evaluation should you calculate. Act like a Strong Player.

Ask:

What is my opponent threatening?
What are my candidate moves?
Which move best improves my position or prevents theirs?
A Simple Endgame Formula

For every position, think:

Material King Activity Pawn Structure Passed Pawns Piece Activity Plans Calculation

This sequence helps prevent overlooking key endgame factors. You can breakdown any endgame position like this. It will answer questions for you, things you never thought to ask.

Good chess has a certain amount of work involved, but that is the beauty of chess.

Why not print out this list (or something similar) and do a test for yourself. Grab 10 endgame positions and methodically go through them with the above criteria and write down each aspect of the position:

Material King Activity Pawn Structure Passed Pawns Piece Activity Plans Calculation

Take a simple example from any chess book/MAGAZINE on endgames and go through the steps:

Who has more pawns?
Are there any passed pawns?
Is one side up a piece?

Which king is more active?
Can a king penetrate into the opponent's position?
Who controls key entry squares?

Passed pawns
Isolated pawns
Doubled pawns
Backward pawns
Pawn majorities

Where do the kings want to go?
Which squares must be controlled?
Are there opposition or triangulation opportunities?

Which rook is more active?
Which bishop has better scope?
Which knight has stronger outposts?

How many moves until promotion?
Can the king stop the pawn?
Does a piece need to sacrifice itself?

Activate the king
Create a passed pawn
Win an enemy pawn
Trade into a favorable king-and-pawn ending
Put a rook behind a passed pawn

What is my opponent threatening?
What are my candidate moves?
Which move best improves my position or prevents theirs?
A Simple Endgame Formula

Keep doing this until you feel comfortable with it. This is part of the onging conversation you have with your pieces during a game. Sure, you may not do - or rember to do - this during a game, but that is what your "chess laboratory" is for - to learn these things and practice them until thery are second nature. It is no use to complain about not doing something then give it little effort to cure the problem.

This is an interesting article (No apologies for using a chess.com link):

10 Principles for Beginners

Act like a Strong Player.
Act like a Strong Player.
Act like a Strong Player.

I TRULY HOPE THIS HELPS YOU BECOME A LITTLE BETTER AT ENDGAME PLAY. Seems like you want a step by step method (AI Assisted, Edited, no apologies). **Material King Activity Pawn Structure Passed Pawns Piece Activity Plans Calculation** Evaluate the position systematically. Act like a Strong player. **1. Count Material** Ask: Who has more pawns? Are there any passed pawns? Is one side up a piece? Material tells you what kind of endgame you're dealing with and whether you should play for a win or a draw. **2. Evaluate the Kings** In endgames, the king becomes an attacking piece. Act like a Strong Player. Check: Which king is more active? Can a king penetrate into the opponent's position? Who controls key entry squares? A more active king is often worth more than a pawn. **3. Identify Pawn Structure** Look for: Passed pawns Isolated pawns Doubled pawns Backward pawns Pawn majorities Passed pawns are usually the most important feature of an endgame. Act like a Strong Player. **4. Find the Critical Squares** Ask: Where do the kings want to go? Which squares must be controlled? Are there opposition or triangulation opportunities? In king-and-pawn endings, a single square often determines the result. Act like a Strong Player. **5. Compare Piece Activity** If pieces remain on the board: Which rook is more active? Which bishop has better scope? Which knight has stronger outposts? Activity is often more important than raw material in endgames. Act like a Strong Player. **6. Calculate Pawn Races** When passed pawns exist, calculate: How many moves until promotion? Can the king stop the pawn? Does a piece need to sacrifice itself? A quick method is to count moves and use the "square of the pawn" rule in king-and-pawn endings. Act like a Strong Player. **7. Assess Winning Plans** After evaluating the position, determine the main plans: For example: Activate the king Create a passed pawn Win an enemy pawn Trade into a favorable king-and-pawn ending Put a rook behind a passed pawn **8. Calculate Concrete Variations** Only after evaluation should you calculate. Act like a Strong Player. Ask: What is my opponent threatening? What are my candidate moves? Which move best improves my position or prevents theirs? A Simple Endgame Formula For every position, think: **Material King Activity Pawn Structure Passed Pawns Piece Activity Plans Calculation** This sequence helps prevent overlooking key endgame factors. You can breakdown any endgame position like this. It will answer questions for you, things you never thought to ask. Good chess has a certain amount of work involved, but that is the beauty of chess. Why not print out this list (or something similar) and do a test for yourself. Grab 10 endgame positions and methodically go through them with the above criteria and write down each aspect of the position: **Material King Activity Pawn Structure Passed Pawns Piece Activity Plans Calculation** Take a simple example from any chess book/MAGAZINE on endgames and go through the steps: Who has more pawns? Are there any passed pawns? Is one side up a piece? Which king is more active? Can a king penetrate into the opponent's position? Who controls key entry squares? Passed pawns Isolated pawns Doubled pawns Backward pawns Pawn majorities Where do the kings want to go? Which squares must be controlled? Are there opposition or triangulation opportunities? Which rook is more active? Which bishop has better scope? Which knight has stronger outposts? How many moves until promotion? Can the king stop the pawn? Does a piece need to sacrifice itself? Activate the king Create a passed pawn Win an enemy pawn Trade into a favorable king-and-pawn ending Put a rook behind a passed pawn What is my opponent threatening? What are my candidate moves? Which move best improves my position or prevents theirs? A Simple Endgame Formula Keep doing this until you feel comfortable with it. This is part of the onging conversation you have with your pieces during a game. Sure, you may not do - or rember to do - this during a game, but that is what your "chess laboratory" is for - to learn these things and practice them until thery are second nature. It is no use to complain about not doing something then give it little effort to cure the problem. This is an interesting article (No apologies for using a chess.com link): [10 Principles for Beginners](https://www.chess.com/article/view/chess-endgames) Act like a Strong Player. Act like a Strong Player. Act like a Strong Player.
TheDifferenceOfTier5

@fallboss007 said ^

endgameqs are 10x more important than openings. The main goal in endgames is to make a queen and not letting the opponent doing one

yeah no sh1t sherlock

@fallboss007 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/tFkfRxHk) > endgameqs are 10x more important than openings. The main goal in endgames is to make a queen and not letting the opponent doing one yeah no sh1t sherlock
TheDifferenceOfTier5

@ChessPriyome

That's just not going to help. Let me explain my problem again
I will look at an endgame that I misplayed, and try to understand what I should have done. But I can't understand what the engine move does and why other moves don't work. I'm not looking for a bunch of generic endgame principles.

@ChessPriyome That's just not going to help. Let me explain my problem again I will look at an endgame that I misplayed, and try to understand what I should have done. But I can't understand what the engine move does and why other moves don't work. I'm not looking for a bunch of generic endgame principles.
kindaspongeyedited

@TheDifferenceOfTier5 said in #18:

... I will look at an endgame that I misplayed, and try to understand what I should have done. But I can't understand what the engine move does and why other moves don't work. I'm not looking for a bunch of generic endgame principles.

Perhaps, it would be easier to provide you with something helpful if you would identify a specific game and move where you did not understand why only the engine move would have worked.

@TheDifferenceOfTier5 said in #18: > ... I will look at an endgame that I misplayed, and try to understand what I should have done. But I can't understand what the engine move does and why other moves don't work. I'm not looking for a bunch of generic endgame principles. Perhaps, it would be easier to provide you with something helpful if you would identify a specific game and move where you did not understand why only the engine move would have worked.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.