R.I.P potla

I'm very sorry to say but his story is finally looking fake. I knew that something was wrong so I gave the police number, when in reality you don't have to contact police for pet assault. There are many different numbers, and no Police can arrest someone without evidence. The OP did not do any post mortem, nor any evidence and claims the police arrested his neighbors.

NIARTIST

@TheMagnusAura said ^

I'm very sorry to say but his story is finally looking fake. I knew that something was wrong so I gave the police number, when in reality you don't have to contact police for pet assault. There are many different numbers, and no Police can arrest someone without evidence. The OP did not do any post mortem, nor any evidence and claims the police arrested his neighbors.

You can cheak in indias new laws and i had proof a boul with saliva of my cat with exact print of my nieghbours

@TheMagnusAura said [^](/forum/redirect/post/TJAUs16W) > I'm very sorry to say but his story is finally looking fake. I knew that something was wrong so I gave the police number, when in reality you don't have to contact police for pet assault. There are many different numbers, and no Police can arrest someone without evidence. The OP did not do any post mortem, nor any evidence and claims the police arrested his neighbors. You can cheak in indias new laws and i had proof a boul with saliva of my cat with exact print of my nieghbours

greenteakitten

edited

@paleshadowofmoon

You can't write a cryptic forum post with an obvious undertone against what I said about empathy and then get angry that I quoted the exact parts I took issue with initially when I suggested people need to grow up and stop asking for perfection from someone who is quite possibly grieving? Calling it "enough" and telling me to "let it go" for merely responding to a post is pretty weird, lol. If villainizing people is quoting their exact words, then so be it. Neutrality isn't about taking the middle ground in every single situation, that's just a fallacy; it's about understanding the difference between a genuine misunderstanding and just an unwillingness to sympathize with someone else's loss. This would be obvious if you just read this above:

Second of all, it's always better to err on the side of not getting a satire/dark humour joke.

I recognize misunderstandings happen (for example, the above shows the difference between how I talk to people who are talking about their misgivings instead of just blindly attacking someone else); I also recognize that people who genuinely commit misunderstandings do their best to own up to it afterwards. I'm not attacking anyone and it is pretty odd to suggest I am. This is the same politeness I give everyone; just without watering down anything.

To the other people here talking about story mismatch:

I don't care if stories don't add up -- I've told stories that sounded obviously fake but were actually entirely real, just with such a terrible delivery that no one believed me. I don't want to speculate on someone else's posts but I do have my own theories for how it does add up quite reasonably if one does not take every single word literally. And even if something is fake and some cruel joke -- so what? Is that somehow a justification for the earlier attacks? Does that mean that we should automatically treat every person who shares a loss with automatic suspicion because people can't just be in a state where they physically can't fully communicate a thesis complete with multiple pages of evidence? I'd rather be the person who "doesn't get it" than ever play the role of the detective. And no, I don't think anyone owes anyone else anything more than basic politeness.

@paleshadowofmoon You can't write a cryptic forum post with an obvious undertone against what I said about empathy and then get angry that I quoted the exact parts I took issue with initially when I suggested people need to grow up and stop asking for perfection from someone who is quite possibly grieving? Calling it "enough" and telling me to "let it go" for merely responding to a post is pretty weird, lol. If villainizing people is quoting their exact words, then so be it. Neutrality isn't about taking the middle ground in every single situation, that's just a fallacy; it's about understanding the difference between a genuine misunderstanding and just an unwillingness to sympathize with someone else's loss. This would be obvious if you just read this above: >>Second of all, it's always better to err on the side of not getting a satire/dark humour joke. I recognize misunderstandings happen (for example, the above shows the difference between how I talk to people who are talking about their misgivings instead of just blindly attacking someone else); I also recognize that people who genuinely commit misunderstandings do their best to own up to it afterwards. I'm not attacking anyone and it is pretty odd to suggest I am. This is the same politeness I give everyone; just without watering down anything. ____ To the other people here talking about story mismatch: I don't care if stories don't add up -- I've told stories that sounded obviously fake but were actually entirely real, just with such a terrible delivery that no one believed me. I don't want to speculate on someone else's posts but I do have my own theories for how it does add up quite reasonably if one does not take every single word literally. And even if something is fake and some cruel joke -- so what? Is that somehow a justification for the earlier attacks? Does that mean that we should automatically treat every person who shares a loss with automatic suspicion because people can't just be in a state where they physically can't fully communicate a thesis complete with multiple pages of evidence? I'd rather be the person who "doesn't get it" than ever play the role of the detective. And no, I don't think anyone owes anyone else anything more than basic politeness.

kolminer9771

@TheMagnusAura said ^

@Idk0011 you proved that humanity does not exist anymore..... I don't have any words for the line ''Ur saying I have an acc notorious for spamming? I’m responding to accusations made against me and my friend, kind_panda''

Oh god what did I just read. Do you know you are replying this to a person who lost his cat which is dead? Do you even know what death feels like before saying this stuff? Do you think universe will ever forgive you for this? This is inhumane.

Before you say, ''my friend also got bullied'' did your friend die? Did your friend escape and got lost from their house?
Before you say ''I'm replying to my friends accusations'' Dude get a life. Your friend left lichess almost a week ago. You are taking it too far, seriously.

Lol.

What are you talking about?

@TheMagnusAura said [^](/forum/redirect/post/EGm1lFGq) > @Idk0011 you proved that humanity does not exist anymore..... I don't have any words for the line ''Ur saying I have an acc notorious for spamming? I’m responding to accusations made against me and my friend, kind_panda'' > > Oh god what did I just read. Do you know you are replying this to a person who lost his cat which is dead? Do you even know what death feels like before saying this stuff? Do you think universe will ever forgive you for this? This is inhumane. > > Before you say, ''my friend also got bullied'' did your friend die? Did your friend escape and got lost from their house? > Before you say ''I'm replying to my friends accusations'' Dude get a life. Your friend left lichess almost a week ago. You are taking it too far, seriously. Lol. What are you talking about?

Your network blocks the Lichess assets!