2+2
so 2 using the two cookies plus two cookies example equals zero cuz I ate them all
same with every other realistic thing, ill eat them too
2+2
so 2 using the two cookies plus two cookies example equals zero cuz I ate them all
same with every other realistic thing, ill eat them too
Modulo 3, all integers are divided into 3 residue classes:
[0], [1], [2]
where
[a]={x∈Z∣x≡a(mod3)}
In other words, all integers that are congruent modulo 3 are considered the same object.
Addition modulo 3 is defined as
[a]+[b]=[a+b]
This definition is well-defined: if [a] = [a′] and [b] = [b′], then
a′=a+3k_1, b′=b+3k_2
Therefore
a′+b′=a+b+3(k_1+k_2)
Hence
[a′+b′]=[a+b]
In other words, the addition is independent of the choice of representatives.
[2]+[2]=[2+2]=[4]
and
4=3+14≡1(mod3)
Thus
[4]=[1]
As a result
[2]+[2]=[1]
Modulo 3, all integers are divided into 3 residue classes:
[0], [1], [2]
where
[a]={x∈Z∣x≡a(mod3)}
In other words, all integers that are congruent modulo 3 are considered the same object.
Addition modulo 3 is defined as
[a]+[b]=[a+b]
This definition is well-defined: if [a] = [a′] and [b] = [b′], then
a′=a+3k_1, b′=b+3k_2
Therefore
a′+b′=a+b+3(k_1+k_2)
Hence
[a′+b′]=[a+b]
In other words, the addition is independent of the choice of representatives.
[2]+[2]=[2+2]=[4]
and
4=3+14≡1(mod3)
Thus
[4]=[1]
As a result
[2]+[2]=[1]
some people say its window get it oh wiat no thats for 1+1+ cuse se eif you attsch teh oen to teh pluesses sides then get teh equals stretch it bit bu tit over teh ones and plueese see 
some people say its window get it oh wiat no thats for 1+1+ cuse se eif you attsch teh oen to teh pluesses sides then get teh equals stretch it bit bu tit over teh ones and plueese see 
imma not be a troll, and say the answer is 2+2=4
imma not be a troll, and say the answer is 2+2=4
@Aadityaarora said ^
some people say its window get it oh wiat no thats for 1+1+ cuse se eif you attsch teh oen to teh pluesses sides then get teh equals stretch it bit bu tit over teh ones and plueese see image.png (https://image.lichess1.org/display?op=noop&path=8pS7h73pjvRP.png&sig=030cccf1f31e509e90f30e8221877def0fd1cf2a)
that is some crazy spelling
@Aadityaarora said [^](/forum/redirect/post/qUaqhIvT)
> some people say its window get it oh wiat no thats for 1+1+ cuse se eif you attsch teh oen to teh pluesses sides then get teh equals stretch it bit bu tit over teh ones and plueese see image.png (https://image.lichess1.org/display?op=noop&path=8pS7h73pjvRP.png&sig=030cccf1f31e509e90f30e8221877def0fd1cf2a)
that is some crazy spelling
Guys, this was supposed to be a reference to 1984 by George Orwell. I don't understand half the math stuff you are saying
Guys, this was supposed to be a reference to 1984 by George Orwell. I don't understand half the math stuff you are saying
If that's the case, then 2+2=π, at least in Timeline 349701.
If that's the case, then 2+2=π, at least in Timeline 349701.
2 pairs of cheese ig ;-;
@LittleChessie said ^
2 pairs of horseys
Not again .__.
@LittleChessie said [^](/forum/redirect/post/hv6k390A)
> 2 pairs of horseys
Not again .__.
<Comment deleted by user>