I've been hearing about "online cheaters" since before the average computer could beat anybody who wasn't pretty weak. Yeah, that used to be true.
And not just here (since I only just joined about six years ago) -- but at every site I've ever used.
But, in truth, cheating at blitz or faster seems pretty rare, especially here and at one other site I could name (but won't). I've been accused of cheating more than once over the years, after playing well and beating somebody rather easily.
They were all hot and bothered, and just SURE they were right! But they weren't right. And, indeed, analysis showed that my game was quite human -- not at all botlike, unfortunately. And, of course, I knew the truth first hand.
What's the excellent old Simon And Garfunkle song say? "...a man hears what he wants to hear / And disregards the rest."
I suspect the closer one gets to long time controls, the more likely some poor soul is tempted to use a comp on the side. But blitz? I think it's pretty rare. And would beating the average patzer even be worth the trouble?
Chess teaches all of us except one person at a time that he or she might actually NOT be the smartest person on Earth, after all (although skill at chess is not perfectly correlated with intelligence). And that's pretty hard for many relatively clever people to endure, especially when they are still young or middle aged.
Chess is not a small pond, and there are a lot of big fishes. Almost everybody must learn to be okay with that. Because that's the way it is.
I've been hearing about "online cheaters" since before the average computer could beat anybody who wasn't pretty weak. Yeah, that used to be true.
And not just here (since I only just joined about six years ago) -- but at every site I've ever used.
But, in truth, cheating at blitz or faster seems pretty rare, especially here and at one other site I could name (but won't). I've been accused of cheating more than once over the years, after playing well and beating somebody rather easily.
They were all hot and bothered, and just SURE they were right! But they weren't right. And, indeed, analysis showed that my game was quite human -- not at all botlike, unfortunately. And, of course, I knew the truth first hand.
What's the excellent old Simon And Garfunkle song say? "...a man hears what he wants to hear / And disregards the rest."
I suspect the closer one gets to long time controls, the more likely some poor soul is tempted to use a comp on the side. But blitz? I think it's pretty rare. And would beating the average patzer even be worth the trouble?
Chess teaches all of us except one person at a time that he or she might actually NOT be the smartest person on Earth, after all (although skill at chess is not perfectly correlated with intelligence). And that's pretty hard for many relatively clever people to endure, especially when they are still young or middle aged.
Chess is not a small pond, and there are a lot of big fishes. Almost everybody must learn to be okay with that. Because that's the way it is.