Increment vs. No Increment

Increment means no more relying on the opponent’s Amazon delivery to save you the game.

OP forgot to mention the third option: delay. In other words, something that in practice falls somewhere in between.

I prefer no increment.

I prefer no increment. Increments are like crutches for people who refuse to learn how to manage their time properly.

@Klaus-Martin-Schwab said ^

I prefer no increment. Increments are like crutches for people who refuse to learn how to manage their time properly.

Yeah normal Bullet players lmao

@Kaan_Burak said ^

I prefer no increment. Increments are like crutches for people who refuse to learn how to manage their time properly.

Yeah normal Bullet players lmao

You can't play chess at any time control. I could give you 30 minutes vs my 1 minute and win every game easily!

@Klaus-Martin-Schwab said ^

I prefer no increment. Increments are like crutches for people who refuse to learn how to manage their time properly.

Yeah normal Bullet players lmao

You can't play chess at any time control. I could give you 30 minutes vs my 1 minute and win every game easily!

Yes I know this you're 2300 tho

@Kaan_Burak said ^

I prefer no increment. Increments are like crutches for people who refuse to learn how to manage their time properly.

Yeah normal Bullet players lmao

You can't play chess at any time control. I could give you 30 minutes vs my 1 minute and win every game easily!

Yes I know this you're 2300 tho

More like 2400. And that rating didn't fall on my from the sky, as you seem to be suggesting. Also, I'm not a bullet player. I'm a chess player who happens to play mostly bullet when playing online to avoid cheaters. I've also played hundreds of nationally rated OTB games and have a FIDE classical rating over 2100

@Klaus-Martin-Schwab said ^

I prefer no increment. Increments are like crutches for people who refuse to learn how to manage their time properly.

Yeah normal Bullet players lmao

You can't play chess at any time control. I could give you 30 minutes vs my 1 minute and win every game easily!

Yes I know this you're 2300 tho

More like 2400. An...

Ok I know this, I'm not only a fast player too. I played an OTB and became 5th from 112 people. I don't have any FIDE because I didn't go any National tournaments. I know you are better than me. I'm just saying my opinion. Also, I won't downvote you because I don't need because everyone can say their idea.

@Kaan_Burak said ^

I prefer no increment. Increments are like crutches for people who refuse to learn how to manage their time properly.

Yeah normal Bullet players lmao

You can't play chess at any time control. I could give you 30 minutes vs my 1 minute and win every game easily!

Yes I know this you're 2300 ...

You're not a fast player@Kaan_Burak said ^

I prefer no increment. Increments are like crutches for people who refuse to learn how to manage their time properly.

Yeah normal Bullet players lmao

You can't play chess at any time control. I could give you 30 minutes vs my 1 minute and win every game easily!

Yes I know this you're 2300 ...

LMAO, you're not a fast player too, you're a weak player. Anyone can mindlessly move the pieces randomly. The trick is to make good moves and win some games. You're only 1900 bullet for a reason. And you're only 1600 or less in the other time controls, lol.

And anyone can "play" OTB. That's hardly an accomplishment. You have to actually perform well, which you definitely did not. You don't have a FIDE rating because you didn't play in any serious events. If you did, you would do very poorly. It's obvious that I'm MUCH stronger than you. In fact, I'm much stronger than you could even have wet dreams about being. You keep repeating this as though it were in question. It's not. What I'M saying is that your opinion isn't worth anything as you have not walked the walk. You only talk the talk.

I couldn't care less whether you downvote or not. Don't flatter yourself.