Modern scandinavian isn't bad

"If i wanted, in 10 minutes I can find games where black completely crushes white with 1.e4 d5"

• Black cannot crush white unless white make a mistake. In those 2 games white crushed black because black made the mistake 2...Nf6? Anyway feel free to post one game where black holds a draw with 2...Nf6 against strong white play.

@tpr said ^

"If i wanted, in 10 minutes I can find games where black completely crushes white with 1.e4 d5"

• Black cannot crush white unless white make a mistake. In those 2 games white crushed black because black made the mistake 2...Nf6? Anyway feel free to post one game where black holds a draw with 2...Nf6 against strong white play.

In those 2 games, white crushed black because black made other dubious moves.

...Bf5 or ...Bg4 are interesting indeed.

Obviously, white winning is far easier than black winning.
90% of games end in white winning (or atleast having a huge advantage)

And there are a few games where black plays well (I checked 50~ to find those)
Your point is right, but its not ALWAYS losing. Especially in under 2000 levels

@tpr said ^

...Bf5 or ...Bg4 are interesting indeed.

Yes, but you have to very accurate with black.

@tpr said ^

Here is another, earlier game from 2006: the white advantage just grows

https://lichess.org/w9bfsSKL#4

what is black's setup here bruh

I think even that black's 6... nb6 after c4 is dubious. 7. c5! and the knight must go back to d7 (d5 is unsound according to teory)
Qxd5 in second move isn't good. 3. nc3! and the queen must move again. what was the point?
And blunder king, stockfish is only 3400 right now. it grews with cirka 30 points per year, so it wil be 3900 for under twenty years

"Qxd5 in second move isn't good"

• Tell that to this player
  
  https://lichess.org/Ehvx4Qco#3

hmmm