Your network blocks the Lichess assets!

lichess.org
Donate

Was World War 2 necessary? (Like Americans joining the war?)

@vihaan_thegr8 said ^

I feel like you should experience a day in a colonised country, then you will understand.

visit scotland. or ireland or wales. we hate england too.

Yes, then, throw a revolution, everybody say, we don’t want England in the map, we are not the colonies of England, it is ironic that I am speaking English, but you won’t understand Hindi, you haven’t bothered to learn Hindi, I am talking to the Eng fan, who tries to justify all their shitty actions, we need to isolate England and the first step is to, rally, the Scottish irish and Welsh.

mate what the heck are you on bruv

Bruh there are 11 pages of discussion. Read it

@vihaan_thegr8 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/wRXJElCv) > > > > I feel like you should experience a day in a colonised country, then you will understand. > > > > > > visit scotland. or ireland or wales. we hate england too. > > > > Yes, then, throw a revolution, everybody say, we don’t want England in the map, we are not the colonies of England, it is ironic that I am speaking English, but you won’t understand Hindi, you haven’t bothered to learn Hindi, I am talking to the Eng fan, who tries to justify all their shitty actions, we need to isolate England and the first step is to, rally, the Scottish irish and Welsh. > > mate what the heck are you on bruv Bruh there are 11 pages of discussion. Read it

@CSKA_Moscou said ^

Here is the Answer of your points one by one

  1. I am not denying that the axis did not commit atrocities ,but let’s look at the Numbers, and since you mentioned India as well, let us look at us as well
    Germany 10=20mil
    Japan 10=20mil
    Britain 3 mil
    France na

350,000 civilian deaths in France (métropole), 1 million in Indochina.

Military losses : 250,000, including 100,000 resistance fighters throughout the occupation period, and 50,000 soldiers killed during the Battle of France in 1940 (which lasted one month).

USSR not a genocide, but millions of kills, due to recklessness, of Stalin

26-27 millions of victims, half were civilians and the other half military personnel. 13 million civilians were killed.

The concept of genocide is when group A seeks to destroy or annihilate group B for reasons of ethnicity or religion. This involves the destruction or annihilation of B by A through repression, torture, and extermination. Given that n.zi propaganda used the theory of racial hierarchy and that the Slavic peoples (Russians, Polish, Ukrainians, Belarusians), as well as Asian peoples (Uzbeks, Kyrgyz, Kazakhs), occupied the bottom of this hierarchy, the n.zi considered them as almost non human and justified all types of torture and atrocities. It should also be noted that the Soviet Union was home to one of the largest Jewish communities in Europe, (second in size after Poland, if I remember well) which was almost annihilated during the Holocaust.

Ok ty

@CSKA_Moscou said [^](/forum/redirect/post/iF7MTj7P) > > Here is the Answer of your points one by one > > 1. I am not denying that the axis did not commit atrocities ,but let’s look at the Numbers, and since you mentioned India as well, let us look at us as well > > Germany 10=20mil > > Japan 10=20mil > > Britain 3 mil > > France na > > 350,000 civilian deaths in France (métropole), 1 million in Indochina. > > Military losses : 250,000, including 100,000 resistance fighters throughout the occupation period, and 50,000 soldiers killed during the Battle of France in 1940 (which lasted one month). > > > > USSR not a genocide, but millions of kills, due to recklessness, of Stalin > > 26-27 millions of victims, half were civilians and the other half military personnel. 13 million civilians were killed. > > The concept of genocide is when group A seeks to destroy or annihilate group B for reasons of ethnicity or religion. This involves the destruction or annihilation of B by A through repression, torture, and extermination. Given that n.zi propaganda used the theory of racial hierarchy and that the Slavic peoples (Russians, Polish, Ukrainians, Belarusians), as well as Asian peoples (Uzbeks, Kyrgyz, Kazakhs), occupied the bottom of this hierarchy, the n.zi considered them as almost non human and justified all types of torture and atrocities. It should also be noted that the Soviet Union was home to one of the largest Jewish communities in Europe, (second in size after Poland, if I remember well) which was almost annihilated during the Holocaust. Ok ty

@tpr said ^

"the bef were sent to defend France in the Belgian weak spot not to attack Germany in Hamburg"

  • How could the United Kingdom have attacked Hamburg in 1938 or 1939? By at least blowing it up,with the royal navy.
    The United Kingdom and France declared war on Germany on 3 September 1939 after the German invasion of Poland.they did barely anything till it was too late.
    France invaded the Saar on 7 September 1939, but withdrew till 4 October 1939 as Poland had capitulated.That was the phony war.
    The British Expeditionary Force was sent to France in September 1939 to assist the French.
    At that time there was no German attack on France yet, that started in May 1940.
    France held its border with its Maginot Line.

Bruh,if the allies were on the offensive, the war would end in 2 years.

@tpr said [^](/forum/redirect/post/zwDoSb4h) > "the bef were sent to defend France in the Belgian weak spot not to attack Germany in Hamburg" > * How could the United Kingdom have attacked Hamburg in 1938 or 1939? By at least blowing it up,with the royal navy. > The United Kingdom and France declared war on Germany on 3 September 1939 after the German invasion of Poland.they did barely anything till it was too late. > France invaded the Saar on 7 September 1939, but withdrew till 4 October 1939 as Poland had capitulated.That was the phony war. > The British Expeditionary Force was sent to France in September 1939 to assist the French. > At that time there was no German attack on France yet, that started in May 1940. > France held its border with its Maginot Line. Bruh,if the allies were on the offensive, the war would end in 2 years.

@Rage698 said ^

Here is the Answer of your points one by one

  1. I am not denying that the axis did not commit atrocities ,but let’s look at the Numbers, and since you mentioned India as well, let us look at us as well
    Germany 10=20mil
    Japan 10=20mil
    Britain 3 mil
    France na

350,000 civilian deaths in France (métropole), 1 million in Indochina.

Military losses : 250,000, including 100,000 resistance fighters throughout the occupation period, and 50,000 soldiers killed during the Battle of France in 1940 (which lasted one month).

USSR not a genocide, but millions of kills, due to recklessness, of Stalin

26-27 millions of victims, half were civilians and the other half military personnel. 13 million civilians were killed.

The concept of genocide is when group A seeks to destroy or annihilate group B for reasons of ethnicity or religion. This involves the destruction or annihilation of B by A through repression, torture, and extermination. Given that n.zi propaganda used the theory of racial hierarchy and that the Slavic peoples (Russians, Polish, Ukrainians, Belarusians), as well as Asian peoples (Uzbeks, Kyrgyz, Kazakhs), occupied the bottom of this hierarchy, the n.zi considered them as almost non human and justified all types of torture and atrocities. It should also be noted that the Soviet Union was home to one of the largest Jewish communities in Europe, (second in size after Poland, if I remember well) which was almost annihilated during the Holocaust.

Ok ty
This no. Was only for the amount of people killed by the country in atrocities against people,in the casualties.

@Rage698 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/y6FA0tpk) > > > Here is the Answer of your points one by one > > > 1. I am not denying that the axis did not commit atrocities ,but let’s look at the Numbers, and since you mentioned India as well, let us look at us as well > > > Germany 10=20mil > > > Japan 10=20mil > > > Britain 3 mil > > > France na > > > > 350,000 civilian deaths in France (métropole), 1 million in Indochina. > > > > Military losses : 250,000, including 100,000 resistance fighters throughout the occupation period, and 50,000 soldiers killed during the Battle of France in 1940 (which lasted one month). > > > > > > > USSR not a genocide, but millions of kills, due to recklessness, of Stalin > > > > 26-27 millions of victims, half were civilians and the other half military personnel. 13 million civilians were killed. > > > > The concept of genocide is when group A seeks to destroy or annihilate group B for reasons of ethnicity or religion. This involves the destruction or annihilation of B by A through repression, torture, and extermination. Given that n.zi propaganda used the theory of racial hierarchy and that the Slavic peoples (Russians, Polish, Ukrainians, Belarusians), as well as Asian peoples (Uzbeks, Kyrgyz, Kazakhs), occupied the bottom of this hierarchy, the n.zi considered them as almost non human and justified all types of torture and atrocities. It should also be noted that the Soviet Union was home to one of the largest Jewish communities in Europe, (second in size after Poland, if I remember well) which was almost annihilated during the Holocaust. > > Ok ty This no. Was only for the amount of people killed by the country in atrocities against people,in the casualties.

@Rage698 said ^

Here is the Answer of your points one by one

  1. I am not denying that the axis did not commit atrocities ,but let’s look at the Numbers, and since you mentioned India as well, let us look at us as well
    Germany 10=20mil
    Japan 10=20mil
    Britain 3 mil
    France na

350,000 civilian deaths in France (métropole), 1 million in Indochina.

Military losses : 250,000, including 100,000 resistance fighters throughout the occupation period, and 50,000 soldiers killed during the Battle of France in 1940 (which lasted one month).

USSR not a genocide, but millions of kills, due to recklessness, of Stalin

26-27 millions of victims, half were civilians and the other half military personnel. 13 million civilians were killed.

The concept of genocide is when group A seeks to destroy or annihilate group B for reasons of ethnicity or religion. This involves the destruction or annihilation of B by A through repression, torture, and extermination. Given that n.zi propaganda used the theory of racial hierarchy and that the Slavic peoples (Russians, Polish, Ukrainians, Belarusians), as well as Asian peoples (Uzbeks, Kyrgyz, Kazakhs), occupied the bottom of this hierarchy, the n.zi considered them as almost non human and justified all types of torture and atrocities. It should also be noted that the Soviet Union was home to one of the largest Jewish communities in Europe, (second in size after Poland, if I remember well) which was almost annihilated during the Holocaust.

Ok,but if Stalin used his newly acquired industry,the soviet union would be ready for war,making the tragedy less severe in scale.
This no. Was only for the amount of people killed by the country in atrocities against people,not the casualties.

@Rage698 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/864nUpff) > > > > Here is the Answer of your points one by one > > > > 1. I am not denying that the axis did not commit atrocities ,but let’s look at the Numbers, and since you mentioned India as well, let us look at us as well > > > > Germany 10=20mil > > > > Japan 10=20mil > > > > Britain 3 mil > > > > France na > > > > > > 350,000 civilian deaths in France (métropole), 1 million in Indochina. > > > > > > Military losses : 250,000, including 100,000 resistance fighters throughout the occupation period, and 50,000 soldiers killed during the Battle of France in 1940 (which lasted one month). > > > > > > > > > > USSR not a genocide, but millions of kills, due to recklessness, of Stalin > > > > > > 26-27 millions of victims, half were civilians and the other half military personnel. 13 million civilians were killed. > > > > > > The concept of genocide is when group A seeks to destroy or annihilate group B for reasons of ethnicity or religion. This involves the destruction or annihilation of B by A through repression, torture, and extermination. Given that n.zi propaganda used the theory of racial hierarchy and that the Slavic peoples (Russians, Polish, Ukrainians, Belarusians), as well as Asian peoples (Uzbeks, Kyrgyz, Kazakhs), occupied the bottom of this hierarchy, the n.zi considered them as almost non human and justified all types of torture and atrocities. It should also be noted that the Soviet Union was home to one of the largest Jewish communities in Europe, (second in size after Poland, if I remember well) which was almost annihilated during the Holocaust. > > > > Ok,but if Stalin used his newly acquired industry,the soviet union would be ready for war,making the tragedy less severe in scale. This no. Was only for the amount of people killed by the country in atrocities against people,not the casualties.

@Rage698 said ^

I feel like you should experience a day in a colonised country, then you will understand.

visit scotland. or ireland or wales. we hate england too.

Yes, then, throw a revolution, everybody say, we don’t want England in the map, we are not the colonies of England, it is ironic that I am speaking English, but you won’t understand Hindi, you haven’t bothered to learn Hindi, I am talking to the Eng fan, who tries to justify all their shitty actions, we need to isolate England and the first step is to, rally, the Scottish irish and Welsh.

First of all, nobody is justifying England and nobody was even talking about England until you decided to bring them up. But I'll bite.

Mein hindi kyu seekhun? 难道你有学中文吗?你觉得你东骂西骂有啥意义吗? Mein tujhe pehle hi bola tha ki saari baat colonization ke baare mein mat banao...

@Rage698 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/OTfF6bJS) > > > I feel like you should experience a day in a colonised country, then you will understand. > > > > visit scotland. or ireland or wales. we hate england too. > > Yes, then, throw a revolution, everybody say, we don’t want England in the map, we are not the colonies of England, it is ironic that I am speaking English, but you won’t understand Hindi, you haven’t bothered to learn Hindi, I am talking to the Eng fan, who tries to justify all their shitty actions, we need to isolate England and the first step is to, rally, the Scottish irish and Welsh. First of all, nobody is justifying England and nobody was even talking about England until you decided to bring them up. But I'll bite. Mein hindi kyu seekhun? 难道你有学中文吗?你觉得你东骂西骂有啥意义吗? Mein tujhe pehle hi bola tha ki saari baat colonization ke baare mein mat banao...

What is this conversation even about at this point

What is this conversation even about at this point

@Rage698 said ^

I feel like you should experience a day in a colonised country, then you will understand.

visit scotland. or ireland or wales. we hate england too.

Yes, then, throw a revolution, everybody say, we don’t want England in the map, we are not the colonies of England, it is ironic that I am speaking English, but you won’t understand Hindi, you haven’t bothered to learn Hindi, I am talking to the Eng fan, who tries to justify all their shitty actions, we need to isolate England and the first step is to, rally, the Scottish irish and Welsh.

mate what the heck are you on bruv

Bruh there are 11 pages of discussion. Read it

No like what's the issue about someone not bothering to learn hindi? How should that matter to you? They can learn whichever language they want, they can talk in whichever language they want. And since English is a common language we generally speak it to interact with people from other countries. How would you feel if someone from another country insists that you speak their language? Or gets mad at you for not bothering to learn their language?
Yes, the English have colonized countries. Yes, they left their language mark on those countries. Yes, it was a really terrible 300 year period for India. Nobody is justifying their actions. But, Yes, English is a common language. Move on.

@Rage698 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/8GmmNLfs) > > > > > I feel like you should experience a day in a colonised country, then you will understand. > > > > > > > > visit scotland. or ireland or wales. we hate england too. > > > > > > Yes, then, throw a revolution, everybody say, we don’t want England in the map, we are not the colonies of England, it is ironic that I am speaking English, but you won’t understand Hindi, you haven’t bothered to learn Hindi, I am talking to the Eng fan, who tries to justify all their shitty actions, we need to isolate England and the first step is to, rally, the Scottish irish and Welsh. > > > > mate what the heck are you on bruv > > Bruh there are 11 pages of discussion. Read it No like what's the issue about someone not bothering to learn hindi? How should that matter to you? They can learn whichever language they want, they can talk in whichever language they want. And since English is a common language we generally speak it to interact with people from other countries. How would you feel if someone from another country insists that you speak their language? Or gets mad at you for not bothering to learn their language? Yes, the English have colonized countries. Yes, they left their language mark on those countries. Yes, it was a really terrible 300 year period for India. Nobody is justifying their actions. But, Yes, English is a common language. Move on.

"if the allies were on the offensive, the war would end in 2 years."
The United Kingdom was on the defensive till October 1940 when it could have lost the Battle of Britain.
The United Sates were on the defensive until June 1942 when it could have lost the Battle of Midway.
The Soviet Union was on the defensive until February 1943 when it could have lost the Battle of Stalingrad.

"if the allies were on the offensive, the war would end in 2 years." The United Kingdom was on the defensive till October 1940 when it could have lost the Battle of Britain. The United Sates were on the defensive until June 1942 when it could have lost the Battle of Midway. The Soviet Union was on the defensive until February 1943 when it could have lost the Battle of Stalingrad.

@Rage698 said ^

‘This is rage baiting ‘
When the truth come out, the allies fan just have to say, this right, really green tea kitchen
You have rage,baited me.

Now, WHAT did you call her?

@Rage698 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/8LiHmt1P) > ‘This is rage baiting ‘ > When the truth come out, the allies fan just have to say, this right, really green tea kitchen > You have rage,baited me. Now, WHAT did you call her?

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.